Ajouter une intrigue dans votre langueAdaptation of Russell Hoban's novel about two mechanical toy mice, and their quest to become "self-winding".Adaptation of Russell Hoban's novel about two mechanical toy mice, and their quest to become "self-winding".Adaptation of Russell Hoban's novel about two mechanical toy mice, and their quest to become "self-winding".
Cloris Leachman
- Euterpe
- (voix)
Sally Kellerman
- The Seal
- (voix)
Andy Devine
- The Frog
- (voix)
Alan Barzman
- The Mouse
- (voix)
John Carradine
- The Tramp
- (voix)
Neville Brand
- Iggy
- (voix)
Regis Cordic
- The Clock
- (voix)
Joan Gerber
- The Elephant
- (voix)
Maitzi Morgan
- Teller
- (voix)
- …
Frank Nelson
- Crow #1
- (voix)
Cliff Norton
- Crow #2
- (voix)
Iris Rainer
- Paper People
- (voix)
- …
Robert Ridgely
- Jack in the Box
- (voix)
- (as Bob Ridgely)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesSir Peter Ustinov (Manny the Rat) and Andy Devine (The Frog) also did voice work for Disney's Robin des Bois (1973), in which Ustinov voiced Prince John and King Richard, and Devine voiced Friar Tuck.
- GaffesDuring the spring when an insane Manny shows up and uses a rock to smash the two toy mice, he isn't wearing his scarf, most likely due to the season change, and his tail was briefly missing when he cowers at the sight and aftermath of the damage he did to the toys. They both reappeared later of in his next scene when he and the other rats invade the dollhouse.
- Citations
The Mouse Child: Papa, I'm afraid! I wanna go home! What's gonna happen to us?
The Mouse: Well, something good, son, as easily as something else. Why, anything can happen.
Manny the Rat: But it won't! Not this evening, my lads!
- Crédits fousIn the Japanese release, the closing credits are altered and feature pictures of characters from the film, which are shown alongside the text on multi-colored backgrounds.
- Versions alternativesThe American release has closing credits simply displayed against a pink background. However, the Japanese release has alternative closing credits with images of characters (see Crazy Credits).
- ConnexionsReferenced in Hudson Hawk, gentleman et cambrioleur (1991)
Commentaire à la une
I once saw this film when I was a small child. I don't know how old, and I barely remembered anything of it, but for some reason, something was causing this full-length, animated movie to stick in the back of my mind for years as I was growing up. I realized that until I fulfilled this desire to see this film again, some part of me would be at unrest. Now, a good 15 years later and a young adult with more money and quite a different mind, I was finally able to purchase a used, rental copy.
I wasn't sure at first how I would react. Would I consider this film childish now? Made in 1977, would it show its age considerably?
I would hate to give away too much of the film, as I firmly believe it must be seen to be understood. The story is simple; a toy mouse and his 'child' embark on a quest to become 'self-winding'. In other words, a journey from childhood to adulthood, from being a robot doing what we are told without question, to becoming an individual with the capability to carry out our own passions and desires. Along their twisted and unsure way to self-fulfillment, they meet a fortune-telling frog, a windup elephant, a muskrat, and other friends, while avoiding the antagonist, the despicable Manny the Rat.
This probably sounds terrible about right here, but I can assure you that the film is likely nothing that you are thinking it is. This is not a Disney usical, nor does it try to be something that it isn't. It is a story about love, inspiration, and the following and actualization of one's dreams. It is a story about cruelty, defeat, and cowardice. Most of all, it is a story about human life, and the sacrifices we make in the journey to discover our purpose, our place in the world.
This film is never cheap, never purposely cute, and never insults the viewer. The animation is not overdone, and attention is paid to detail in all the right places. The settings are wonderful and really add to the story and the situation the main characters are in. The music sets just the right mood at the right times.
I may have enjoyed this film as a child, and I'm not sure what kept it on the back burner through the years at all, but I can definitely say as an adult now the film moved me more than it ever could have as a child. I was literally in tears after the final scene, staring at the credits in silent applause. I had finally found why I couldn't forget about this film, and that is simply because it was excellent and very touching.
Disney may have the special effects, the storybook plots, and the musical majesty. However, when examining a film at deeper than surface level, Disney in all its camaraderie can't touch this powerful and effective film that tells a story about the human condition and how simply unfair life can be.
4 Stars. Probably one of the least acclaimed (and most deserving) animated films I have ever had the pleasure of viewing.
I wasn't sure at first how I would react. Would I consider this film childish now? Made in 1977, would it show its age considerably?
I would hate to give away too much of the film, as I firmly believe it must be seen to be understood. The story is simple; a toy mouse and his 'child' embark on a quest to become 'self-winding'. In other words, a journey from childhood to adulthood, from being a robot doing what we are told without question, to becoming an individual with the capability to carry out our own passions and desires. Along their twisted and unsure way to self-fulfillment, they meet a fortune-telling frog, a windup elephant, a muskrat, and other friends, while avoiding the antagonist, the despicable Manny the Rat.
This probably sounds terrible about right here, but I can assure you that the film is likely nothing that you are thinking it is. This is not a Disney usical, nor does it try to be something that it isn't. It is a story about love, inspiration, and the following and actualization of one's dreams. It is a story about cruelty, defeat, and cowardice. Most of all, it is a story about human life, and the sacrifices we make in the journey to discover our purpose, our place in the world.
This film is never cheap, never purposely cute, and never insults the viewer. The animation is not overdone, and attention is paid to detail in all the right places. The settings are wonderful and really add to the story and the situation the main characters are in. The music sets just the right mood at the right times.
I may have enjoyed this film as a child, and I'm not sure what kept it on the back burner through the years at all, but I can definitely say as an adult now the film moved me more than it ever could have as a child. I was literally in tears after the final scene, staring at the credits in silent applause. I had finally found why I couldn't forget about this film, and that is simply because it was excellent and very touching.
Disney may have the special effects, the storybook plots, and the musical majesty. However, when examining a film at deeper than surface level, Disney in all its camaraderie can't touch this powerful and effective film that tells a story about the human condition and how simply unfair life can be.
4 Stars. Probably one of the least acclaimed (and most deserving) animated films I have ever had the pleasure of viewing.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Mouse and His Child?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Extraordinary Adventures of the Mouse and His Child
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was The Mouse and His Child (1977) officially released in Canada in English?
Répondre