NOTE IMDb
6,1/10
16 k
MA NOTE
La suite de Chinatown (1974) retrouve J. J. « Jake » Gittes enquêtant sur l'adultère, le meurtre et l'argent provenant du pétrole.La suite de Chinatown (1974) retrouve J. J. « Jake » Gittes enquêtant sur l'adultère, le meurtre et l'argent provenant du pétrole.La suite de Chinatown (1974) retrouve J. J. « Jake » Gittes enquêtant sur l'adultère, le meurtre et l'argent provenant du pétrole.
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAt a movie theatre in Florida a patron left his seat to tell the theater manager that the reels of the movie were running out of sequence. The manager went to check and confirmed this, but then told the moviegoer "this movie's been playing here for three weeks and you're the first person who noticed that something was wrong."
- GaffesJake tells Ralph when they are standing in front of the laundry if he got dimes for phone calls. In 1948, the cost of a payphone was five cents. It didn't go to 10 cents until 1951.
- Citations
Jake Gittes: What I do for a living may not be very reputable... but I am. In this town I'm the leper with the most fingers.
- Versions alternativesFor the 2007 DVD release, Jack Nicholson had some of the narration and the music cues removed. He also supervised a color correction.
- ConnexionsEdited from Chinatown (1974)
Commentaire à la une
This sounded pretty good... Nicholson is mostly fun to watch, and I enjoyed Chinatown immensely(Towne returning to write this sequel was a treat, as well). I enjoyed it for a while, but not too far past the half-way point, I realized that it had run out of steam... the film kept rolling, but it no longer kept the viewers' attention. Jack Nicholson is no director, and it shows... while he is a skilled actor, he should stay in front of the camera instead of trying his hand behind it. The cinematography is close, but doesn't quite make it to being good... we have shots that linger, and wasted opportunities aplenty. Polanski's loose, involving camera is sorely missed here. The pacing is also off... the film ends up seeming heavy as a result. The writing is quite good. The acting varies, but is mostly on the positive end. The tone isn't entirely sure what it wants to be, but does create some great "noir" moments. Jake's monologues are occasionally spot-on. The mystery varied some... parts of it, I had figured out before the lead, whereas others only became clear to me just as they were revealed. This is a hit and miss scenario... and unfortunately, it misses more than it hits. This is worth watching as a continuation of Chinatown for those that want more of the plot, and can compromise with the drop in style and finesse of the film-making values. I recommend this to big fans of Jack Nicholson and those interested in seeing what occurred after the events of Chinatown. 6/10
- TBJCSKCNRRQTreviews
- 2 déc. 2006
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Two Jakes?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Langues
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- The Two Jakes
- Lieux de tournage
- 5608 S Soto St., Huntington Park, Californie, États-Unis(J.J. 'Jake' Gittes office)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 19 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 10 005 969 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 3 729 149 $US
- 12 août 1990
- Montant brut mondial
- 10 005 969 $US
- Durée2 heures 17 minutes
- Couleur
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was The Two Jakes - Piège pour un privé (1990) officially released in India in English?
Répondre