NOTE IMDb
6,4/10
3,5 k
MA NOTE
À Taipei, le scientifique infirme Hashimoto utilise son invention de « l'éponge de Menger » pour capturer l'énergie de l'esprit d'un enfant dans un vieux bâtiment.À Taipei, le scientifique infirme Hashimoto utilise son invention de « l'éponge de Menger » pour capturer l'énergie de l'esprit d'un enfant dans un vieux bâtiment.À Taipei, le scientifique infirme Hashimoto utilise son invention de « l'éponge de Menger » pour capturer l'énergie de l'esprit d'un enfant dans un vieux bâtiment.
- Récompenses
- 1 victoire et 5 nominations au total
Yôsuke Eguchi
- Hashimoto
- (as Yosuke Eguchi)
Karena Ka-Yan Lam
- Wei
- (as Karena Lam)
Bo-lin Chen
- Ren
- (as Po-Lin Chen)
Ning Chang
- Mei
- (as Janine Chun-Ning Chang)
Fang Wan
- Ghost Mother
- (as Wan Fan)
Chi-Chin Ma
- Tung's Mother
- (as Chih-Chin Ma)
Masane Tsukayama
- Director
- (as Tsukayama Masane)
Kouhei Masiba
- Assistant to Director
- (as Masiba Kouhei)
Pinky Juan
- Teacher
- (as Wen-Ping Juan)
Pong Fong Wu
- Bomb Squad A
- (as Peng-Feng Wu)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesThe director, Chao-Bin Su is also co-starring as the guard in front of the isolated flat.
- GaffesWhen Tung finds the body of the boy, the body is in near-perfect condition, when it should have rotted.
- ConnexionsReferences Mo fa a ma (1998)
Commentaire à la une
I rented this on DVD today and was pleasantly surprised. The DVD has an alternative ending for the movie, which I am glad had not been used. The ending that was chosen was the better choice.
I was immediately drawn into this movie with it's intriguing story. How each character approached the mystery of the captured ghost and their own agenda's made for more intrigue to see how each came together to finalize the story. On another plus for this movie was the lack of gore ... there was "some," but not of the type to ruin such a good movie. Of course, one scene was a bit bloody, but it was a necessary scene for emphasis. The two lead roles had seriously realistic depth regarding love, hate, compassion, suffering and death. Due to the creativeness and imagination that went into developing the characters, I lost myself into the film forgetting they were acting.
All aspects were done very well ... good timing, special affects, lighting (was a little too dark at the first of the movie), music score, cast ... everything was superbly done. Also, it was nice that the movie had a good ending and wasn't one of those that leave you hanging with "gee, there'll be a sequel." The one thing that did not come out well for me on my regular television was the strands of silk. If I had not watched the Special Affects on the DVD to know there was supposed to be silk threads emanating out of a bowl of noodles I would not have known (and didn't know when I watched the film) that silk threads were present. Then again, I watched this movie this afternoon, when the television gets more daylight obliterating fine details such as this, so I recommend watching this in a darkened room to fully appreciate it and maybe the first part of the film won't seem so dark. I recommend this movie and if more than a 10 rating could be given I would do so. It's one of the best "horror-thrillers" (go light on the horror) I've seen in a very long time with a story that's not been done before.
I was immediately drawn into this movie with it's intriguing story. How each character approached the mystery of the captured ghost and their own agenda's made for more intrigue to see how each came together to finalize the story. On another plus for this movie was the lack of gore ... there was "some," but not of the type to ruin such a good movie. Of course, one scene was a bit bloody, but it was a necessary scene for emphasis. The two lead roles had seriously realistic depth regarding love, hate, compassion, suffering and death. Due to the creativeness and imagination that went into developing the characters, I lost myself into the film forgetting they were acting.
All aspects were done very well ... good timing, special affects, lighting (was a little too dark at the first of the movie), music score, cast ... everything was superbly done. Also, it was nice that the movie had a good ending and wasn't one of those that leave you hanging with "gee, there'll be a sequel." The one thing that did not come out well for me on my regular television was the strands of silk. If I had not watched the Special Affects on the DVD to know there was supposed to be silk threads emanating out of a bowl of noodles I would not have known (and didn't know when I watched the film) that silk threads were present. Then again, I watched this movie this afternoon, when the television gets more daylight obliterating fine details such as this, so I recommend watching this in a darkened room to fully appreciate it and maybe the first part of the film won't seem so dark. I recommend this movie and if more than a 10 rating could be given I would do so. It's one of the best "horror-thrillers" (go light on the horror) I've seen in a very long time with a story that's not been done before.
- RobinCook70
- 3 févr. 2008
- Permalien
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is Silk?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut mondial
- 854 535 $US
- Durée1 heure 48 minutes
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant