Regardez le monde à travers le prisme de l'alimentation et découvrez comment l'alimentation explique le passé et prédit l'avenir.Regardez le monde à travers le prisme de l'alimentation et découvrez comment l'alimentation explique le passé et prédit l'avenir.Regardez le monde à travers le prisme de l'alimentation et découvrez comment l'alimentation explique le passé et prédit l'avenir.
- Création originale
- Stars
- Récompenses
- 3 nominations au total
Parcourir les épisodes
Avis à la une
Rene Redzepi, the acclaimed chef of Noma, is undoubtedly a culinary genius. His innovative approach to cooking has revolutionized the food world, making him an influential figure in contemporary gastronomy. However, the decision to cast him as the narrator of "Omnivore" seems to have been a misstep. Redzepi's narration lacks the engaging dynamism needed to capture and retain the audience's attention. His delivery, while knowledgeable, feels monotonous and fails to evoke the excitement and curiosity that the subject matter warrants.
The first episode of "Omnivore" sets the tone for the series, but unfortunately, it falls short of expectations. The pacing is slow, and the content, though rich in potential, is presented in a way that feels uninspired. Viewers may find their minds wandering, unable to connect deeply with the material. The episode's structure and presentation do not do justice to the vibrant and diverse world of food it aims to explore.
The first episode of "Omnivore" sets the tone for the series, but unfortunately, it falls short of expectations. The pacing is slow, and the content, though rich in potential, is presented in a way that feels uninspired. Viewers may find their minds wandering, unable to connect deeply with the material. The episode's structure and presentation do not do justice to the vibrant and diverse world of food it aims to explore.
I can only assume many of the other reviews come from food snobs, "influencers", or those who just enjoy being negative and pseudo-intellectual.
Do I agree that the episodes can be lacking in content and history? Of course. A 1 hour episode on chili peppers, or any single ingredient, can't begin to cover the entire history. Regardless, for the regular person (not a "foodie"), I'm learning a lot.
I view this series as an introductory series. Maybe Food 101. If you want more advanced stuff, by all means, go find some books. Watch other documentaries.
I was entertained. The series kept my interest, even if parts of it were simplistic in nature. Most of all, I learned. And now I want to know more. That's a win, in my book.
Do I agree that the episodes can be lacking in content and history? Of course. A 1 hour episode on chili peppers, or any single ingredient, can't begin to cover the entire history. Regardless, for the regular person (not a "foodie"), I'm learning a lot.
I view this series as an introductory series. Maybe Food 101. If you want more advanced stuff, by all means, go find some books. Watch other documentaries.
I was entertained. The series kept my interest, even if parts of it were simplistic in nature. Most of all, I learned. And now I want to know more. That's a win, in my book.
1. This is boring, for each topic they explain five minutes and then they show like 20 minutes of repetitive shots
2. History is plain and reductionist
It was expected we would know the history of each food, but this just show a commercial look of the item
Imagine that for chili they talked about paprika and Tabasco, there is a lot more.
Mexico was not mentioned, even this is the country which consume more chilly and the crazy relationship of Aztecs with it. Not to mention the great variety of chilies they have.
3. Beautiful shots I can say that photograph was so nice, but it is useless without a genuine story to tell.
Mexico was not mentioned, even this is the country which consume more chilly and the crazy relationship of Aztecs with it. Not to mention the great variety of chilies they have.
3. Beautiful shots I can say that photograph was so nice, but it is useless without a genuine story to tell.
I truly enjoyed Omnivore. It's not only beautiful filmed, it's also educational, enlightening and inspiring. I like how each episode is structured slightly differently, so the show never gets repetitive or boring. There are certain themes that are present throughout, but each ingredient is treated in a unique way. It's interesting the way different styles of farming are compared and contrasted, such as massive U. S. corn production versus micro-farming where tiny cobs are harvested by hand. Some viewers might see the series as being judgmental, but I think it acknowledges the need for mega-farming (feeding the entire world for an affordable cost), versus the need for micro-farming (preserving traditions or, in the case of bananas, ensuring that if and when Cavendish bananas can no longer be produced we have another variety to fall back on). All in all, this series fascinated me. It's definitely one of Apple TV+'s best documentaries. Excellent watch and an 8.8 for me.
Don't get me wrong, AppleTV+ has some excellent content like Severance, For All Mankind and Presumed Innocent. But even with their top tier stuff, there's this whiff of something noxious that I couldn't quite put my finger on.
This docu-series perfectly encapsulates it: that odor is the smug condescension of the global one percent. Hosted by some celebrity chef from a fancy restaurant few people could ever afford to dine at, it trots through some popular foods, focused on just a tiny fragment of the whole industry, the fancy pants artisanal froo-froo segment.
It's lovely that some dude in Rwanda is making coffee by hand, for what, $100 a pound? Obviously this has no relevance to the common herd, watching grocery prices soar and thinking about what they have to cut back.
The episode about salt could have been fascinating, especially if it did anything more than, once again, talk about the teeny industry of making salt by hand. How about the long, fascinating history of salt in various human cultures? We barely get any of that.
Netflix (which in general doesn't have anything near the quality of AppleTV+ anymore) made a good series along the same lines called Rotten. If you're frustrated by Omnivore, check that out. Eschewing the prissy approach, Netflix takes us to the gang wars of the avocado trade, the cratering French wine industry, and corruption in the garlic industry. Much more real and relevant.
This docu-series perfectly encapsulates it: that odor is the smug condescension of the global one percent. Hosted by some celebrity chef from a fancy restaurant few people could ever afford to dine at, it trots through some popular foods, focused on just a tiny fragment of the whole industry, the fancy pants artisanal froo-froo segment.
It's lovely that some dude in Rwanda is making coffee by hand, for what, $100 a pound? Obviously this has no relevance to the common herd, watching grocery prices soar and thinking about what they have to cut back.
The episode about salt could have been fascinating, especially if it did anything more than, once again, talk about the teeny industry of making salt by hand. How about the long, fascinating history of salt in various human cultures? We barely get any of that.
Netflix (which in general doesn't have anything near the quality of AppleTV+ anymore) made a good series along the same lines called Rotten. If you're frustrated by Omnivore, check that out. Eschewing the prissy approach, Netflix takes us to the gang wars of the avocado trade, the cratering French wine industry, and corruption in the garlic industry. Much more real and relevant.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
Détails
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
