Moby is a likeable music author who had his shining moments in popular music at the end of the 90s of the last century (the album "Play" from 1999). Unfortunately, he decided to stake his long-gone musical credibility on incompatible things, which simply do not stand, except that they are currently suitable for modern times, which have become fertile ground for all kinds of brainwashing, twisting of facts and replacement of theses.
The film is technically correct, from the material that I assume was available. It was published on YouTube, which is an intelligent move, because it is truly unbelievable that anyone would waste time and money watching something like this in commercial exploitation. Unfortunately, it is hardly worth watching even in the home version. It is irritating that nihilism in rock music from the second half of the 70s is linked to some kind of veganism, aside from whether, and to what extent, both initiatives were, or were not, correct views of the world. The music, as revolutionary as it was in that period, brought both positive and negative influences in the musical styles that followed. In any case, Punk movement was a consequence of the postmodernism of the second half of the twentieth century, and veganism and the so-called "animal rights" are terms more appropriate to the metamodernism that followed as a reaction to the mentioned period. So, by definition, really incompatible.
In addition to such a bad setting, in the movie it can also be seen a handful of infantile shots, when the author talks to an imaginary interlocutor, at the same level as the entire film, as well as provisional interviews with members of third-grade bands from the musical margins with whom Moby allegedly had common beginnings (which is far from being something positive, and which we didn't even have to find out). All in all, an hour and a half of wasted time, which everyone could use much better.
At this point I would add, although no one expects the depth of thought, e.g. A much better musician, Roger Waters, nor the level of his addressing to the UN the other day, at least we should not deal with attempts of falsifying of the history of the music scene from more than 40 years ago. Or perhaps that's exactly why we should?
If you happen to be interested in music, spend time listening (and/or watching) it in the original, you don't need bad interpretations of something that has been recorded on various sound carriers and on the Internet. If you happen to be a vegan and a fighter for animal rights, I don't know what you should do, but definitely don't waste your time watching this failed attempt to rewrite history, use it better for your activism, or something else that interests you.
