Lorsque tous les enfants d'une même classe, sauf un, disparaissent mystérieusement la même nuit et exactement à la même heure, une communauté se demande qui ou quoi se cache derrière leur di... Tout lireLorsque tous les enfants d'une même classe, sauf un, disparaissent mystérieusement la même nuit et exactement à la même heure, une communauté se demande qui ou quoi se cache derrière leur disparition.Lorsque tous les enfants d'une même classe, sauf un, disparaissent mystérieusement la même nuit et exactement à la même heure, une communauté se demande qui ou quoi se cache derrière leur disparition.
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
- Narrator
- (voix)
Avis à la une
Director Zach Cregger continues to prove he's not afraid to break the mold, following up Barbarian (2022) with another unpredictable, non-traditional narrative. The story starts off familiar, but quickly evolves into something far more layered and unsettling.
I especially appreciated the decision to split the narrative across multiple characters - it added depth and gave the audience a clearer view of the bigger picture.
My only real critique is the ending - it was a bit abstract and left me slightly unsatisfied. Still, it fits the film's overall tone and ambition.
Highly recommended for fans of horror that challenges the norm.
The trailer caught my attention, and I went in expecting a decent movie; I wasn't expecting to be as entertained as I was. Weapons absolutely delivered on all levels.
The storytelling was amazing; it was like an onion being peeled back, layer after layer. It was so clever. There were so many creepy moments, and the scenes inside the house were at times chilling and really unsettling.
Great characters; Gladys was an absolute riot and deserves to return in whatever format. Amy Madigan was fantastic, and credit goes to the makeup team as well. This is the most different and creatively imaginative film I've seen in ages. I loved it.
Out of interest, this is a challenging movie for snacks at the cinema, there are multiple silent scenes, you'll hear every slurp of coke and every crunch of popcorn. I'll never take pringles again.
8/10.
2) I avoided all trailers, marketing and reviews, so I am not a victim of overhyping.
3) I felt like this would be another example of a movie that will be unanimously praised and lauded as the best/scariest horror movie of the year. That seems to be the case.
4) Six stars is a positive score, but this review will be mostly negative as I try to explain why I didn't like this more.
5) The mystery is built masterfully. But once we find out who or what is behind the horror, all I could think is, "That's it?" I hoped there was more to the story or somewhere interesting the plot could go from there. But there really isn't.
6) They keep telling us more about the flawed characters, and have them involved in drama, which I enjoyed as it happened. But it doesn't come into play even a tiny bit, not with the story or any character arcs.
7) There are some really good horror elements and jaw-dropping moments. But I ask myself if I would watch this again, and the answer is... probably not.
8) It's a good movie, but I can't help but feel underwhelmed.
(1 viewing, opening Thursday EMX 8/7/2025)
Normally, it takes a while for a film to draw me in and build up the suspense, but this one grabs your attention from the very first scene and keeps you hooked all the way through.
The pacing is tight, the atmosphere is intense, and the story unfolds in a way that keeps you constantly curious. I also really appreciated the performances - the acting felt authentic and added depth to the overall experience.
The ending was satisfying, though I gave it 8 stars because a few elements of the mystery remained unresolved - or perhaps intentionally left open to interpretation.
Still, a fantastic film and a must-watch for fans of smart, original horror!
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesNetflix was ready to pay more money upfront than New Line, but an assured theatrical release and New Line's track record with horror were the better selling points.
- GaffesIn one POV, the homeless man is in the back of the officers car until dark- until the point when the officer, who is clearly possessed, charges the car and drags him in the house. Yet, in another POV, Alex comes home from school during the day, notices the cruiser, and then sees the homeless man possessed inside his house. Alex would have noticed the cruiser when leaving for school in the morning OR the homeless man would still be inside the cruiser.
- Citations
Captain Ed: Mr. Graff, I can understand your passion and I don't mind having these conversations with you because god forbid if it was my child, I'd be demanding answers too. Those kids walked out of those homes, no one pulled them out. No one forced them. What do you see that I don't?
- Crédits fousThe New Line Cinema and Domain Entertainment logos have the sounds of children talking in the background.
- ConnexionsFeatured in Tyrone Magnus: Weapons | Official Trailer | Reaction! (2025)
- Bandes originalesBeware of Darkness
Written and Performed by George Harrison
Courtesy of G. H. Estate Limited
By arrangement of BMG Rights Management (US) LLC
Meilleurs choix
- How long is Weapons?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Sites officiels
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- La hora de la desaparición
- Lieux de tournage
- Atlanta, Géorgie, États-Unis(location)
- Sociétés de production
- Voir plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 38 000 000 $US (estimé)
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 136 355 961 $US
- Week-end de sortie aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 43 501 217 $US
- 10 août 2025
- Montant brut mondial
- 239 055 961 $US
- Durée
- 2h 8min(128 min)
- Couleur
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 2.39 : 1