फिल्म निर्माता एंड्रयू जारेकी अनसुलझे अपराधों की एक श्रृंखला में प्रमुख संदिग्ध, पुनरावर्ती रियल एस्टेट आइकन रॉबर्ट डर्स्ट के जटिल जीवन की जांच करते हैं.फिल्म निर्माता एंड्रयू जारेकी अनसुलझे अपराधों की एक श्रृंखला में प्रमुख संदिग्ध, पुनरावर्ती रियल एस्टेट आइकन रॉबर्ट डर्स्ट के जटिल जीवन की जांच करते हैं.फिल्म निर्माता एंड्रयू जारेकी अनसुलझे अपराधों की एक श्रृंखला में प्रमुख संदिग्ध, पुनरावर्ती रियल एस्टेट आइकन रॉबर्ट डर्स्ट के जटिल जीवन की जांच करते हैं.
- 2 प्राइमटाइम एमी जीते
- 8 जीत और कुल 13 नामांकन
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाRobert Durst agreed to be interviewed after he saw Andrew Jarecki's film All Good Things (2010), and wanted to give his side of the story. Durst seeing the film, led to Jarecki being contacted to create this documentary.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Late Night with Seth Meyers: Keri Russell/Senator Ted Cruz/Smallpools (2015)
- साउंडट्रैकFresh Blood
Written by Mark Oliver Everett & Kool G. Murder
Performed by Eels
Courtesy of Vagrant Records
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
The Jinx is a great show. I am not American, and I had never heard about the case nor the Durst family before this show. Going in knowing nothing led to some of the revelations being really shocking. The fact that the show is so exciting is at least partly due to the case itself being absolutely bonkers on many levels.
But what makes it more exciting is the wealth of information, people and footage they got access to. You really felt that you were thrown into the middle of an investigation, and saw the case unraveling in front of you. And Robert Dust is a compelling figure. It's difficult to place him as either an eccentric evil genius, or a lucky loony. Probably he is somewhere in the middle. Some of the stuff he does seems more like a bumbling fool than an educated criminal, while other things seems really well thought out. It keeps you on the edge of your seat. His mannerisms and just his character in general is also perfect for a show like this. Because despite everything: He can be pretty funny.
So, as entertainment it was really good. That said: I did not like the reenactments. It felt cheap and out of place, and was not needed for the documentary. There were other parts that should have been left out as well, like when they start annoying a man working security in one of the Durst buildings.
But I guess one of the more important questions to ask yourself here is: should journalism go more in this direction? Because this was, have no doubt about it, made to entertain. Here's my initial thoughts: Except the literal victims here, there are no other victims of this show that I can think of. The friends and family of both victims and others involved seems to have gotten their say, or at least had the chance to. The producers did a really good job researching and investigating the case, and the presentation seems truthful enough. The focus on Robert never turns him entirely into a movie character. Througot the series you start to understand him more as a human being. Or at least the producers impression of him. For now I am in the position that journalism is probably going to go more in this direction, but it is a dangerous path, for it can very easily focus too much on the entertainment and to little on the responsibility of a journalist presenting a case.
But what makes it more exciting is the wealth of information, people and footage they got access to. You really felt that you were thrown into the middle of an investigation, and saw the case unraveling in front of you. And Robert Dust is a compelling figure. It's difficult to place him as either an eccentric evil genius, or a lucky loony. Probably he is somewhere in the middle. Some of the stuff he does seems more like a bumbling fool than an educated criminal, while other things seems really well thought out. It keeps you on the edge of your seat. His mannerisms and just his character in general is also perfect for a show like this. Because despite everything: He can be pretty funny.
So, as entertainment it was really good. That said: I did not like the reenactments. It felt cheap and out of place, and was not needed for the documentary. There were other parts that should have been left out as well, like when they start annoying a man working security in one of the Durst buildings.
But I guess one of the more important questions to ask yourself here is: should journalism go more in this direction? Because this was, have no doubt about it, made to entertain. Here's my initial thoughts: Except the literal victims here, there are no other victims of this show that I can think of. The friends and family of both victims and others involved seems to have gotten their say, or at least had the chance to. The producers did a really good job researching and investigating the case, and the presentation seems truthful enough. The focus on Robert never turns him entirely into a movie character. Througot the series you start to understand him more as a human being. Or at least the producers impression of him. For now I am in the position that journalism is probably going to go more in this direction, but it is a dangerous path, for it can very easily focus too much on the entertainment and to little on the responsibility of a journalist presenting a case.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि45 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.78 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
टॉप गैप
What was the official certification given to The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst (2015) in India?
जवाब