पेरिस में, 1960 के दशक में, एक अमेरिकी मुक्केबाज, अंतरराष्ट्रीय फासीवादी साजिश का शिकार बन जाता है, जो एक नई वैश्विक व्यवस्था का निर्माण कर रही है.पेरिस में, 1960 के दशक में, एक अमेरिकी मुक्केबाज, अंतरराष्ट्रीय फासीवादी साजिश का शिकार बन जाता है, जो एक नई वैश्विक व्यवस्था का निर्माण कर रही है.पेरिस में, 1960 के दशक में, एक अमेरिकी मुक्केबाज, अंतरराष्ट्रीय फासीवादी साजिश का शिकार बन जाता है, जो एक नई वैश्विक व्यवस्था का निर्माण कर रही है.
Francesco Mulè
- Trevi Policeman
- (as Francesco Mulé)
Geneviève Cluny
- Veronique
- (as Genevieve Cluny)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाOddly, the film leaves out the detail which explains the title - the all-important list of names which George Peppard gets hold of is, in the novel, in code, which is broken via a knowledge of Tarot cards. In the film, it's just a list of names, so the brief moment where the Patience Collier character is seen laying out Tarot cards has no resonance for the later scenes.
- कनेक्शनReferenced in Crime Scene: Murder on 42nd St. (2021)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
There is little wrong with this movie. But then there's something just not right . . .
Then as the film rolls on the flaw becomes clear: the movie is paced a tad too slow.
It's well acted, well written and beautifully filmed. The incidental music works, the minor characters are played well, and the storyline is quite believable. If it had been a bit more sassy in pace & energy then the film would have worked better.
George Peppard has a laid-back attitude to his character. Which would have worked excellently had the pace of the film been more upbeat: we would have sensed a man fighting his surroundings, yin against yang. That would have fit in nicely with the story. But as each - pace & protagonist - were so leisurely, this stance took the film almost to a frustratingly downbeat attitude. I believe relaxed was more Peppard's own style in life re his profession, as I gather he refuted being a star - despite the studios loving his being a 6 foot tall blonde hunk of a man. Instead he preferred to do things his own way. (So he missed his calling then: as he seems truly an actor suited to the '60s & '70s, rather than a box office screen idol of the decade he started acting, the '50s.)
The best points are when the writer surprises us ((no spoilers here!)). At these points the film really starts to take off at last . . . Only to then lose that all-important tempo. Disappointing. As the rest of the film seems to offer little in unexpected moments, or any real excitement. And as the movie is meant to be a suspense story, with all the associated moments in a thriller of unforeseen turns, such 'zip' is what is lacking.
Had it been less maudlin in feel, I could have rated it higher. Sadly, as a thriller it doesn't offer much in the way of thrills! Insipid it is, inspiring it (sadly) is not.
Then as the film rolls on the flaw becomes clear: the movie is paced a tad too slow.
It's well acted, well written and beautifully filmed. The incidental music works, the minor characters are played well, and the storyline is quite believable. If it had been a bit more sassy in pace & energy then the film would have worked better.
George Peppard has a laid-back attitude to his character. Which would have worked excellently had the pace of the film been more upbeat: we would have sensed a man fighting his surroundings, yin against yang. That would have fit in nicely with the story. But as each - pace & protagonist - were so leisurely, this stance took the film almost to a frustratingly downbeat attitude. I believe relaxed was more Peppard's own style in life re his profession, as I gather he refuted being a star - despite the studios loving his being a 6 foot tall blonde hunk of a man. Instead he preferred to do things his own way. (So he missed his calling then: as he seems truly an actor suited to the '60s & '70s, rather than a box office screen idol of the decade he started acting, the '50s.)
The best points are when the writer surprises us ((no spoilers here!)). At these points the film really starts to take off at last . . . Only to then lose that all-important tempo. Disappointing. As the rest of the film seems to offer little in unexpected moments, or any real excitement. And as the movie is meant to be a suspense story, with all the associated moments in a thriller of unforeseen turns, such 'zip' is what is lacking.
Had it been less maudlin in feel, I could have rated it higher. Sadly, as a thriller it doesn't offer much in the way of thrills! Insipid it is, inspiring it (sadly) is not.
- SceneByScene
- 10 सित॰ 2023
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is House of Cards?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 45 मिनट
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें