IMDb रेटिंग
1.8/10
2.1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंMotorcycle racer Rommel seeks vengeance against JC, a madman who murdered the sidehacker's fiancee.Motorcycle racer Rommel seeks vengeance against JC, a madman who murdered the sidehacker's fiancee.Motorcycle racer Rommel seeks vengeance against JC, a madman who murdered the sidehacker's fiancee.
Michael Pataki
- J.C.
- (as Mike Pataki)
Robert Tessier
- Jake
- (as Bob Tessier)
Warren Hammack
- Mechanic
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Goldie Hawn
- Spectator
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Tony Lorea
- Announcer
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाGoldie Hawn: an uncredited spectator at the end of the race in the beginning of the film.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Sidehackers (1990)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
I've seen almost all the bad movie classics. Most of the classics of bad cinema are bad because of low production values, bad acting and silly plots. No such luck here. The production values are adequate for the subject matter and the plot is fairly standard. Unfortunately, these are the things that make the classics entertaining.
What we're left with is a meandering script with a very standard plot, bad acting, and worst of all, incompetent direction. The movie is filled with long sequences, such as the sidehacking race from which it gets one of its titles, that add nothing to the plot or characters that couldn't have been accomplished in one tenth the time.
If that weren't enough, what little plot is stuck between these sequences is either difficult to follow or just doesn't make sense. For instance, at one point a character is killed and it took me a while to figure it out. Not that it was supposed to be a secret, the point just wasn't conveyed the way it was apparently intended. And throughout the whole movie, up to and including the end, I couldn't understand why the characters were doing the things they were doing. In the few places I did understand, I didn't get why they were going about it the way they were.
In short, this movie is incredibly bad, and not in any fun way. It's quite probably the worst movie I've ever seen. I would not recommend this to anyone for a straight viewing. The only way anyone will get any fun out of it is by ripping into it with friends or letting the professionals do it for them via the excellent MST3K treatment, which is available on DVD.
What we're left with is a meandering script with a very standard plot, bad acting, and worst of all, incompetent direction. The movie is filled with long sequences, such as the sidehacking race from which it gets one of its titles, that add nothing to the plot or characters that couldn't have been accomplished in one tenth the time.
If that weren't enough, what little plot is stuck between these sequences is either difficult to follow or just doesn't make sense. For instance, at one point a character is killed and it took me a while to figure it out. Not that it was supposed to be a secret, the point just wasn't conveyed the way it was apparently intended. And throughout the whole movie, up to and including the end, I couldn't understand why the characters were doing the things they were doing. In the few places I did understand, I didn't get why they were going about it the way they were.
In short, this movie is incredibly bad, and not in any fun way. It's quite probably the worst movie I've ever seen. I would not recommend this to anyone for a straight viewing. The only way anyone will get any fun out of it is by ripping into it with friends or letting the professionals do it for them via the excellent MST3K treatment, which is available on DVD.
- Ace_of_Sevens
- 29 सित॰ 2003
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Five the Hard Way?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 22 मिनट
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें