रिंग का संघ, वन रिंग को नष्ट करने और मध्य-पृथ्वी पर सौरोन के शासन को समाप्त करने की यात्रा पर निकलता है.रिंग का संघ, वन रिंग को नष्ट करने और मध्य-पृथ्वी पर सौरोन के शासन को समाप्त करने की यात्रा पर निकलता है.रिंग का संघ, वन रिंग को नष्ट करने और मध्य-पृथ्वी पर सौरोन के शासन को समाप्त करने की यात्रा पर निकलता है.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 3 नामांकन
Christopher Guard
- Frodo
- (वॉइस)
William Squire
- Gandalf
- (वॉइस)
Michael Scholes
- Sam
- (वॉइस)
Simon Chandler
- Merry
- (वॉइस)
Dominic Guard
- Pippin
- (वॉइस)
Norman Bird
- Bilbo
- (वॉइस)
Michael Graham Cox
- Boromir
- (वॉइस)
- (as Michael Graham-Cox)
Anthony Daniels
- Legolas
- (वॉइस)
David Buck
- Gimli
- (वॉइस)
Peter Woodthorpe
- Gollum
- (वॉइस)
Fraser Kerr
- Saruman
- (वॉइस)
Philip Stone
- Theoden
- (वॉइस)
Michael Deacon
- Wormtongue
- (वॉइस)
André Morell
- Elrond
- (वॉइस)
- (as Andre Morell)
Alan Tilvern
- Innkeeper
- (वॉइस)
Annette Crosbie
- Galadriel
- (वॉइस)
John Westbrook
- Treebeard
- (वॉइस)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाPredominantly filmed with live actors in black-and-white and rotoscoped, each animation cel drawn over a film frame of an actor. However, several sequences do not use rotoscoping.
- गूफ़The name of the wizard of Isengard fluctuates between "Saruman" and "Aruman" throughout the movie.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनThe version screened on British TV in the 1980s contains more music than the recently-released VHS and DVD version.
- कनेक्शनEdited from Aleksandr Nevskiy (1938)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
I'm fond of this film and it vexes me that so many "reviewers" rank it below the Peter Jackson trilogy. A filmed novel is always interpretive; in particular an animated film relies on the artist's vision and should be judged on its own terms. Speaking as a purist, this is a finer homage to Tolkien than the updated version. While this film has its flaws it stays truer to the source, especially so far as the characters are concerned.
In the Jackson version Tolkien's Frodo is barely recognizable: from the first scenes he is portrayed as a weakling, constantly wavering, manipulated by forces around him and never standing on his own two feet (this is physically and metaphorically true.) You wonder why fate chose this limp biscuit to carry the one ring to the Cracks of Doom. Jackson unforgivably rewrites Tolkien and robs Frodo of his finest moment when he allows Arwen to rescue him from the Ringwraiths...Bakshi's version respects the original, presenting a Frodo who demands the wraiths "Go back and trouble me no more!" Bakshi sustains Frodo's character as Tolkien conceived it. We see his decline as the weight of his burden increases. Frodo is so pivotal to Lord of the Rings you wonder why Jackson took such liberties (he does so with numerous characters)since character development propels the plot to its inevitable conclusion. Bakshi's film better explores the companionship between Legolas and Gimli in a few judicious scenes that are completely lacking in Jackson's version. Similarly we see Boromir horsing with Pippin and Merry, furthering the idea of fellowship. For my liking the camaraderie is more developed in the animated version than the live action.
Tolkien's poetry is an important ingredient in the novels and Bakshi makes tribute to this in one of my favorite scenes: when Frodo sings the "Merry Old Inn" song, minutes before stumbling into Strider. The cheery tune is chillingly juxtaposed with the darker theme music when seconds later, invisible to his friends but visible to the wraiths, Frodo is dangerously exposed. This is one of the most atmospheric portions of the film and chills me whenever I see it.
The well documented budget/time restrictions limit this film's final impact but had it been completed it may have resonated with more viewers. As it is, it's worth a look. Even its detractors admit that Peter Jackson derived much of his inspiration from this prototype.
In the Jackson version Tolkien's Frodo is barely recognizable: from the first scenes he is portrayed as a weakling, constantly wavering, manipulated by forces around him and never standing on his own two feet (this is physically and metaphorically true.) You wonder why fate chose this limp biscuit to carry the one ring to the Cracks of Doom. Jackson unforgivably rewrites Tolkien and robs Frodo of his finest moment when he allows Arwen to rescue him from the Ringwraiths...Bakshi's version respects the original, presenting a Frodo who demands the wraiths "Go back and trouble me no more!" Bakshi sustains Frodo's character as Tolkien conceived it. We see his decline as the weight of his burden increases. Frodo is so pivotal to Lord of the Rings you wonder why Jackson took such liberties (he does so with numerous characters)since character development propels the plot to its inevitable conclusion. Bakshi's film better explores the companionship between Legolas and Gimli in a few judicious scenes that are completely lacking in Jackson's version. Similarly we see Boromir horsing with Pippin and Merry, furthering the idea of fellowship. For my liking the camaraderie is more developed in the animated version than the live action.
Tolkien's poetry is an important ingredient in the novels and Bakshi makes tribute to this in one of my favorite scenes: when Frodo sings the "Merry Old Inn" song, minutes before stumbling into Strider. The cheery tune is chillingly juxtaposed with the darker theme music when seconds later, invisible to his friends but visible to the wraiths, Frodo is dangerously exposed. This is one of the most atmospheric portions of the film and chills me whenever I see it.
The well documented budget/time restrictions limit this film's final impact but had it been completed it may have resonated with more viewers. As it is, it's worth a look. Even its detractors admit that Peter Jackson derived much of his inspiration from this prototype.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
Everything New on Max in December
Everything New on Max in December
Looking for something different to add to your Watchlist? Take a peek at what movies and TV shows are coming to streaming this month.
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- El señor de los anillos
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $40,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $3,04,71,420
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $6,26,649
- 19 नव॰ 1978
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $3,04,77,175
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 12 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.78 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें