You know what the problem of this movie is? The way people look at it, simply because they measure it by the "big and loud" American action movies of the 1990s, and that's really unfair.
Here, or as you can find in that kind of low budget movies, there is no huge production, top elements, bankable stars, or international wide releases. So they struggle to have the opportunity to make movies, good ones at the least, and to sell them inside USA, or around the world. And as for (Fifty/Fifty), I believe they did it good this time.. so good indeed.
When you have an action movie of that kind, then you'll have stars like (Christopher Lambert), (Brandon Lee), (Dolph Lundgren), (Don the dragon Wilson), (Cynthia Rothrock). And there are others who got more fame and appreciation in the Middle East like (Chuck Norris), (Steven Seagal), (Jean-Claude Van Damme). All of the above, with all due respect for them and for their lovers, had more bad movies than their own good, and they are all whether not good actors, or mostly the worst ever!
Therefore when you watch such a brilliant and entertaining small movie like (Fifty/Fifty), you have to evaluate it firstly as an independent film, and secondly as one with no acting problems.
As for the story, obviously it's an inspiration of the classic Japanese movie (Seven Samurai - 1954), however after updating it for the 1990s, and giving the lead roles of it to 2 merry versions of (Rambo).
By the way, the (Seven Samurai) story was remade, countless times, in countless cinemas, all over the world. For instance, (The Magnificent Seven - 1960) in America, (Shams elzanaty - 1991) in Egypt, or (Sholay - 1975) in India; and that last one looks like the basis for (Fifty/Fifty), regarding too many proofs such as: there are just 2 defenders of the weak village not 7, the love story between one of them and a local girl, and the toss up play by the coin between the 2 leads. Otherwise, they're just strange coincidences!
The most enjoyable thing is that it has wonderful action. Just remember the sequences at the jungle, or the climax which was perfect, knowing that there was no CGI at all. So with excellent thrill, lovely comic moments, and flawless acting, what would an action fan need more?!
It was quite a surprise when I knew that the movie's director was (Charles Martin Smith) the same short actor who played the character of (Martin Sprue) the American intelligence officer. That's a reason for the bright and nice acting I suppose. And as a director, he managed to realize a too dazzling movie despite its budget.
I had an amazing time with it, from start to finish, especially every shot that got (Peter Weller) and (Robert Hays) together. As for (Robert Hays), he is so gifted in comedy and in action as well. He looks like (Jean-Paul Belmondo) American cousin, but with his own distinguished character. It makes you ask eagerly where is such an actor? And why he isn't a star? While OTHERS are.. unfortunately!
I loved all the fun and the fine work of it more than a lot, and I mean a lot, of Hollywood big and loud action movies. In one word, this time independent cinema really wins.
