अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThe story of a balloonist who finds a lost child and decides to raise him.The story of a balloonist who finds a lost child and decides to raise him.The story of a balloonist who finds a lost child and decides to raise him.
फ़ोटो
Arturo Castro 'Bigotón'
- Sargento
- (as Bigoton Castro)
Armando Acosta
- Carnicero
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Victorio Blanco
- Casero
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Víctor Manuel Castro
- Lic. Bernardo de la Fuente
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Magda Donato
- Secretaria de escuela
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Pedro Elviro
- Maestro de lucha
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Leonor Gómez
- Vendedora de tomates
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
Elvira Lodi
- Madre de niño en parque
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
José Carlos Méndez
- Hijo de maestro lucha
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
कहानी
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
Some 1961 movies still hold up. But not many. And not this one.
Based on Chaplin's The Kid, this movie follows the extremely implausible goings on of a balloon salesman (globero). I don't want to spoil the plot twists.so instead I will focus on its style.
It tries to copy Chaplin's Vaudeville acting style. But it pales by comparison. The camera work is disjointed and distracting with countless jump cuts and poor continuity.
The fights and blocking seem intended to have been hilarious, and maybe they were to unsophisticated viewers in the 1960s, but today the haminess of feeble karate chops that elicit exaggerated wincing and terrible bruise make up fall flat, even for kids.
The obviously empty luggage and horribles holes in the plot are now unforgivable sins in cinema. Even for slapstick comedies that seek to be profound.
This might be an interesting film for a film historian. But not for anyone else who wants to spend two hours wisely.
Based on Chaplin's The Kid, this movie follows the extremely implausible goings on of a balloon salesman (globero). I don't want to spoil the plot twists.so instead I will focus on its style.
It tries to copy Chaplin's Vaudeville acting style. But it pales by comparison. The camera work is disjointed and distracting with countless jump cuts and poor continuity.
The fights and blocking seem intended to have been hilarious, and maybe they were to unsophisticated viewers in the 1960s, but today the haminess of feeble karate chops that elicit exaggerated wincing and terrible bruise make up fall flat, even for kids.
The obviously empty luggage and horribles holes in the plot are now unforgivable sins in cinema. Even for slapstick comedies that seek to be profound.
This might be an interesting film for a film historian. But not for anyone else who wants to spend two hours wisely.
- van_de_burgt
- 23 मार्च 2022
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 30 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें