Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?
- टीवी फ़िल्म
- 2001
- 45 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.4/10
1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंWere the Apollo moon landings faked?Were the Apollo moon landings faked?Were the Apollo moon landings faked?
फ़ोटो
Howard McCurdy
- Self - Space Historian, American University
- (as Howard McCurdy Ph.D.)
Paul N. Lazarus III
- Self - Producer, Capricorn One
- (as Paul Lazarus III)
Thomas Ronald Baron
- Self - Safety Inspector
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Geoffrey Reeves
- Self - Space Physicist
- (as Dr. Geoffrey Reeves)
Gus Grissom
- Self - Astronaut
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- (बिना क्रेडिट के)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- कनेक्शनFeatured in MoonFaker: Exhibit A: Shadows (2007)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
Why are you all so determined to slate the show? Does it not seem reasonable that the American Government is lying again, they do lie about most things you know! With all the conjecture about "did we?" or "didn't we?" No body has thought about what the Government of a nation is capable of... Threatening, killing, destroying, lying, hiding... etc.
It's obvious to even the very dim that the video footage and all its evidence is fake. It does NOT mean that there was no Moon landing though. It IS possible to land on the moon (even then), but those bits of evidence from NASA were faked in order to show what couldn't be shown for real (due to technology issues). Some of those pictures were most probably 'touched up' to show detail. Since NASA had already denied this, they would lose face if the truth came out. So they continue to deny. As for: No stars, no engine plume, no crater, flag moves... These are explained through simple means (as mentioned in earlier posts). It does, however, raise other questions, like... Who filmed the ascent? Or, why evidence suddenly goes missing after its authors death, which could prove or dis-prove this whole debate? THINK BEFORE YOU RANT AND WAVE YOUR FLAG!
So instead of slagging those whom know the difference between fake and real pictures/film. Remember, they would also be happily proved wrong. Fox are bound to issue a rebuttal. Wouldn't you, if the Government threatened you? They are known for it after all.
It's obvious to even the very dim that the video footage and all its evidence is fake. It does NOT mean that there was no Moon landing though. It IS possible to land on the moon (even then), but those bits of evidence from NASA were faked in order to show what couldn't be shown for real (due to technology issues). Some of those pictures were most probably 'touched up' to show detail. Since NASA had already denied this, they would lose face if the truth came out. So they continue to deny. As for: No stars, no engine plume, no crater, flag moves... These are explained through simple means (as mentioned in earlier posts). It does, however, raise other questions, like... Who filmed the ascent? Or, why evidence suddenly goes missing after its authors death, which could prove or dis-prove this whole debate? THINK BEFORE YOU RANT AND WAVE YOUR FLAG!
So instead of slagging those whom know the difference between fake and real pictures/film. Remember, they would also be happily proved wrong. Fox are bound to issue a rebuttal. Wouldn't you, if the Government threatened you? They are known for it after all.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि45 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें