40 एकड़ जमीन प्राप्त करने के बाद, एक पूर्व-गुलाम परिवार अपनी जमीन के पीछे की सच्चाई को उजागर करने के लिए मनुष्य और मिथक से लड़ता है।40 एकड़ जमीन प्राप्त करने के बाद, एक पूर्व-गुलाम परिवार अपनी जमीन के पीछे की सच्चाई को उजागर करने के लिए मनुष्य और मिथक से लड़ता है।40 एकड़ जमीन प्राप्त करने के बाद, एक पूर्व-गुलाम परिवार अपनी जमीन के पीछे की सच्चाई को उजागर करने के लिए मनुष्य और मिथक से लड़ता है।
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I have no idea what the writer/director was going for in this movie. It's not scary, first of all. Second, it's so slow and disjointed that it's boring and nonsensical. Did most of the movie get cut? Because there was such bizarre cuts between scenes, like one scene you see a boy hunting and then suddenly his dad appears out of nowhere. I'm worried that the director was using a bootleg copy of a film editing app on a really old cell phone.
There's absolutely no explanation or dialogue to describe what is happening for the first half of the film. The "scary" part is a black mist that randomly appears, a guy that goes catatonic for most of the movie, and a woman in a well. Oh wait, two women in a well. This movie was a waste of time, and just confirms that there's no end of money for mediocrity. The actors are all fine, they make the best of really bad material.
Scorsese would weep if he watched this.
There's absolutely no explanation or dialogue to describe what is happening for the first half of the film. The "scary" part is a black mist that randomly appears, a guy that goes catatonic for most of the movie, and a woman in a well. Oh wait, two women in a well. This movie was a waste of time, and just confirms that there's no end of money for mediocrity. The actors are all fine, they make the best of really bad material.
Scorsese would weep if he watched this.
Massa's wagon runs over slave child. Bad acting ensues.
Does anyone remember "Roots"? Does anyone remember what a step forward that was?
How bad is this movie? Have you seen the anti-smoking commercials that constantly pervade TV? Such as the one where some lady has had her toes cut off because of smoking? This movie is worse than that.
Have you seen the episode of "Leave It To Beaver" where the Beav climbs up on a billboard with a coffee cup on it, Beaver falls into the coffee cup, and has to have the fire department come in to get him out? This movie is even stupider than that.
Spend your life doing better things than watching this horrible movie.
Does anyone remember "Roots"? Does anyone remember what a step forward that was?
How bad is this movie? Have you seen the anti-smoking commercials that constantly pervade TV? Such as the one where some lady has had her toes cut off because of smoking? This movie is worse than that.
Have you seen the episode of "Leave It To Beaver" where the Beav climbs up on a billboard with a coffee cup on it, Beaver falls into the coffee cup, and has to have the fire department come in to get him out? This movie is even stupider than that.
Spend your life doing better things than watching this horrible movie.
I think the concept might have been good, if I'm deciphering this mess correctly, but it's hard to tell. Disjointed, sloppy art direction, and some talented actors in search of a director. Ed Wood much?
And Rusty? You can do better than this dog.
It's a shame this concept wasn't better executed, because the story concept has real potential.
Pure Southern Gothic is great if it is well executed and the rich storyline of the a family in search of mother set in the reconstruction era and facing a haunted farm is a rich canvas. So why didn't we see a better set and costumes. I understand production during the pandemic was limiting, but surely we could have had moodier lighting and a little dirt and dust? It was like this was shot in a museum.
And Rusty? You can do better than this dog.
It's a shame this concept wasn't better executed, because the story concept has real potential.
Pure Southern Gothic is great if it is well executed and the rich storyline of the a family in search of mother set in the reconstruction era and facing a haunted farm is a rich canvas. So why didn't we see a better set and costumes. I understand production during the pandemic was limiting, but surely we could have had moodier lighting and a little dirt and dust? It was like this was shot in a museum.
Nothing about this movie was thrilling. There were so many things that made no sense. I feel like the writers were stoned 15 year olds who were like let's add all of these things and when someone said "those don't make sense" they all laughed and said "exactly." Waste of time. I expected much more and feel like it could have been done so much better. The story could have had so much more to it. The actors were pretty good though. I will give it that. No idea where the people rating it a 10 we're watching and I wish I could have seen it through their eyes.
Won't watch again and I don't recommend to anyone wanting a thriller or horror movie.
Won't watch again and I don't recommend to anyone wanting a thriller or horror movie.
Not a thriller nor a horror movie. I don't think the other reviews are for this movie. Nothing in those other reviews happened in this movie. Looks like it was shot on a phone. I think they just created as much of a story as they could and then started filming. I hate to bash what the crew and actors did but this is not worth the time we took to see it. We kept waiting for it to make sense but it just never gets there. Since it's based around the historical and famous underground railroad from civil war times, I thought it might have some redeeming qualities, but it just doesn't. It struggles with acting, lighting, story, and overall plot.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is A Southern Haunting?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 34 मि(94 min)
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39:1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें