IMDb रेटिंग
7.3/10
2 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThe atomic bomb and meltdowns like Fukushima have made nuclear power synonymous with global disaster. But what if we've got nuclear power wrong?The atomic bomb and meltdowns like Fukushima have made nuclear power synonymous with global disaster. But what if we've got nuclear power wrong?The atomic bomb and meltdowns like Fukushima have made nuclear power synonymous with global disaster. But what if we've got nuclear power wrong?
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 जीत
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
- Self - Environmental Activist
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- (as Robert Kennedy Jr.)
Amory Lovins
- Self - Environmental Scientist
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
Jim Inhofe
- Self - Senator, Oklahoma
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- (as James Inhofe)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe majority of the film's budget was raised through individual investors, mainly Silicon Valley millionaires.
- भाव
Himself - Environmental Activist: I'm wearing radiation clothing, it shouldn't be necessary.
- कनेक्शनReferenced in TopTenz: 10 Little Known But Genuinely Disturbing Films About Nukes (2018)
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
Plot
The atomic bomb and meltdowns like Fukushima have made nuclear power synonymous with global disaster. But what if we've got nuclear power wrong?
Cast
Made by Robert Stone, a totally unbias gentleman clearly who also did another similar documentary called Atomic Hope (2022).
Verdict
I becoming rather disillusioned when it comes to documentaries, I miss the days it was just a person doing a documentary film on a subject without bias nor agenda. Now the vast majority of documentaries feel forced, feel like propaganda, feel like they've been bought and paid for by an industry, feel politically motivated! I expected Pandora's Promise to feel the same but it doesn't, not exactly anyway.
Many people are saying this plays out like a commercial for nuclear energy and though I get the logic I'd disagree but it's far from unbiased.
You see it presents itself as featuring those who are pro-nuclear, those anti-nuclear and those on the fence. The trouble is, I don't believe it for a second. They're all pro-nuclear playing the role of people who need convincing that nuclear is good and their ridiculous one sided education is basically the entire documentary.
Does it address the criticisms? Yes, but it does it at such a gloriously skew angle it glosses over it and misdirects the viewer. The thing is amidst the misdirection are lies, and I don't appreciate this. When you resort to lies to get your point across, your point is lost entirely.
Pandora's Promise isn't a propaganda documentary, but it does have an agenda.
Rants
There are various accomplishments that governments and corporations have done involving swaying people into voting/fighting against their best interests such as convincing people in the US they don't want healthcare! That one always astounds me but what the fuel industry has done swaying people in favour of environmentally damaging options and making them hate environmentalists and valid alternatives is incredible!
The Good
Relatively well made
The Bad
Dishonest Agenda laden The dynamic of supposed anti-nuclear gone pro-nuclear is insulting.
The atomic bomb and meltdowns like Fukushima have made nuclear power synonymous with global disaster. But what if we've got nuclear power wrong?
Cast
Made by Robert Stone, a totally unbias gentleman clearly who also did another similar documentary called Atomic Hope (2022).
Verdict
I becoming rather disillusioned when it comes to documentaries, I miss the days it was just a person doing a documentary film on a subject without bias nor agenda. Now the vast majority of documentaries feel forced, feel like propaganda, feel like they've been bought and paid for by an industry, feel politically motivated! I expected Pandora's Promise to feel the same but it doesn't, not exactly anyway.
Many people are saying this plays out like a commercial for nuclear energy and though I get the logic I'd disagree but it's far from unbiased.
You see it presents itself as featuring those who are pro-nuclear, those anti-nuclear and those on the fence. The trouble is, I don't believe it for a second. They're all pro-nuclear playing the role of people who need convincing that nuclear is good and their ridiculous one sided education is basically the entire documentary.
Does it address the criticisms? Yes, but it does it at such a gloriously skew angle it glosses over it and misdirects the viewer. The thing is amidst the misdirection are lies, and I don't appreciate this. When you resort to lies to get your point across, your point is lost entirely.
Pandora's Promise isn't a propaganda documentary, but it does have an agenda.
Rants
There are various accomplishments that governments and corporations have done involving swaying people into voting/fighting against their best interests such as convincing people in the US they don't want healthcare! That one always astounds me but what the fuel industry has done swaying people in favour of environmentally damaging options and making them hate environmentalists and valid alternatives is incredible!
The Good
Relatively well made
The Bad
Dishonest Agenda laden The dynamic of supposed anti-nuclear gone pro-nuclear is insulting.
- Platypuschow
- 2 जून 2024
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $10,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $66,680
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $23,419
- 16 जून 2013
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $66,680
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 27 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें