IMDb रेटिंग
5.1/10
17 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
टेसा कनोवर (कैथरीन हाईगल) अपनी टूटी हुई शादी से उबर नहीं पाती। पर टेसा की जलन पागलपन का रूप ले लेती है।टेसा कनोवर (कैथरीन हाईगल) अपनी टूटी हुई शादी से उबर नहीं पाती। पर टेसा की जलन पागलपन का रूप ले लेती है।टेसा कनोवर (कैथरीन हाईगल) अपनी टूटी हुई शादी से उबर नहीं पाती। पर टेसा की जलन पागलपन का रूप ले लेती है।
- पुरस्कार
- 2 नामांकन
Isabella Kai
- Lily Connover
- (as Isabella Kai Rice)
Robert Wisdom
- Detective Pope
- (as Robert Ray Wisdom)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाWhen Tessa is sitting at her computer looking at her and David's wedding photos, the photos are Katherine Heigl's actual wedding photos from her marriage to Josh Kelley. This is why the photos do not show the groom's face.
- गूफ़When Rosario Dawson's company is throwing her a going away party. There is an Indian man sitting on the couch (in the center). When the camera flips back and forth from Rosario's face to Whitney's speech the Indian man disappears and then is back sitting on the couch.
- भाव
Tessa Connover: There. Now you're perfect. Just like Mommy.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The Bachelor: The Women Tell All (2017)
- साउंडट्रैकCloud
Written by Danielle Parente and Sage Atwood
Performed by Danielle Parente
Courtesy of Gravelpit Music
फीचर्ड रिव्यू
I need to write this review quickly before I forget that I even watched this. Was the title supposed to be a paradox?
They must not have spent very much money on this film because it shows. It had the potential as a plot but failed in execution. It seems that this film wants to be Gone Girl, but you have to actually be able or want to write a script for that to have happened.
Rosario's character is too weak and needs more lines.
Heigl's character (I don't remember the name in the film and I'm not putting effort into remembering) is overly developed. Julia (played by Rosario) is unfortunately not balanced against this development; this leaves the viewer feeling too frustrated to root for her. As the viewer, I feel manipulated into wanting her to finally stand up to Heigl's character.
This script is too formulaic and insulting to the viewer. For Lifetime, yes this is fair quality but unacceptable for a WB production in 2017.
1 star and this is for the styling team that maintained Rosario's wavy hairstyle.
The film does try to explain why Heigl's character is the way she is, but this is also as hackneyed as Rosario being a weak abuse victim. Give me something throughout the rising action so that I am not left underwhelmed by the climax. Speaking of climax, the sex screen was dry. I like math so I am all for a formula if it works but this 1+1=2 is not as exciting as something like a system of equations with nuanced and dynamic characters vs. these very stale and static ones. Why is the ex husband so dumb? Is it because he is that self-absorbed that he couldn't put together that his ex is crazy and capable of madness? These characters were written so poorly that I really didn't care about anyone. So if the goal of this film was an exercise in apathy, then well done!
They must not have spent very much money on this film because it shows. It had the potential as a plot but failed in execution. It seems that this film wants to be Gone Girl, but you have to actually be able or want to write a script for that to have happened.
Rosario's character is too weak and needs more lines.
Heigl's character (I don't remember the name in the film and I'm not putting effort into remembering) is overly developed. Julia (played by Rosario) is unfortunately not balanced against this development; this leaves the viewer feeling too frustrated to root for her. As the viewer, I feel manipulated into wanting her to finally stand up to Heigl's character.
This script is too formulaic and insulting to the viewer. For Lifetime, yes this is fair quality but unacceptable for a WB production in 2017.
1 star and this is for the styling team that maintained Rosario's wavy hairstyle.
The film does try to explain why Heigl's character is the way she is, but this is also as hackneyed as Rosario being a weak abuse victim. Give me something throughout the rising action so that I am not left underwhelmed by the climax. Speaking of climax, the sex screen was dry. I like math so I am all for a formula if it works but this 1+1=2 is not as exciting as something like a system of equations with nuanced and dynamic characters vs. these very stale and static ones. Why is the ex husband so dumb? Is it because he is that self-absorbed that he couldn't put together that his ex is crazy and capable of madness? These characters were written so poorly that I really didn't care about anyone. So if the goal of this film was an exercise in apathy, then well done!
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Unforgettable?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Unforgettable
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,20,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $1,13,68,012
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $47,85,431
- 23 अप्रैल 2017
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $1,77,68,012
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 40 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें