Animali fantastici: I crimini di Grindelwald
Titolo originale: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
La seconda puntata della serie "Animali fantastici" ambientata nel magico mondo di J.K. Rowling e presenta le avventure del magizoologo Newt Scamandro.La seconda puntata della serie "Animali fantastici" ambientata nel magico mondo di J.K. Rowling e presenta le avventure del magizoologo Newt Scamandro.La seconda puntata della serie "Animali fantastici" ambientata nel magico mondo di J.K. Rowling e presenta le avventure del magizoologo Newt Scamandro.
- Nominato ai 2 BAFTA Award
- 3 vittorie e 23 candidature totali
Cornell John
- Arnold Guzman
- (as Cornell S. John)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizJohnny Depp signed on without reading a script. He wanted to be a part of the series because he is a self-proclaimed massive fan of the series.
- BlooperAccording to the books and Pottermore.com (site created by JK Rowling herself), Minerva McGonagall was born in 1935 and first started teaching at Hogwarts in 1956, when she was 21 years old. Even though the movie is set in 1927, eight years before her birth, she appears as a young professor in Hogwarts.
- Citazioni
Leta Lestrange: Oh, Newt. You never met a monster you couldn't love.
- Curiosità sui creditiThere are no mid- or end-credit scenes.
- Versioni alternativeAn extended cut runs ~7 minutes longer.
Recensione in evidenza
Let me start off by saying that I am a big Harry Potter fan; I loved all 8 HP movies, and really liked the 1st installment of Newt's adventures as well.
This movie just didn't really do the trick for me. There was absolutely nothing to complain about visually; the movie was even more stunning than the first one, with even more beautifully designed 'Beasts'. And as many other people have mentioned, as a Harry Potter fan, you just can't hate this movie. Where Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them only contained a handful amount of references to the Harry Potter series, The Crimes of Grindelwald has tonnes. Enough to hype up any Harry Potter fan.
The problem this movie had for me was its plot, or rather, its almost nonexisting plot. This movie just seemed to serve as background information or something for the upcoming movies in this series (for which we'll undoubtedly have to wait another 2 years or more..), more of like a setup for things to come. It introduced many new characters and revealed certain things about already known characters. But yet, some of these things just felt unnatural, as if JK Rowling just kept writing more and more to squeeze into 1 movie. This basically leads to a movie where the biggest plot is to find Credence's 'true identity' - not really much of a plot at all. Some of the reveals about characters also seemed a bit strange, but that could be just me. All in all, all this dialogue about characters made it extra confusing to know what the movie was about, in addition to it lacking much of a plot to begin with.
This movie is definitely not a waste of money or anything, you could just buy a ticket for the stunning scenes and you'd be satisfied. It's just that this movie was quite a disappointment compared to many people's expectations I think, seeing as it basically is just a setup for the upcoming movies, which lacks a good plot.
The problem this movie had for me was its plot, or rather, its almost nonexisting plot. This movie just seemed to serve as background information or something for the upcoming movies in this series (for which we'll undoubtedly have to wait another 2 years or more..), more of like a setup for things to come. It introduced many new characters and revealed certain things about already known characters. But yet, some of these things just felt unnatural, as if JK Rowling just kept writing more and more to squeeze into 1 movie. This basically leads to a movie where the biggest plot is to find Credence's 'true identity' - not really much of a plot at all. Some of the reveals about characters also seemed a bit strange, but that could be just me. All in all, all this dialogue about characters made it extra confusing to know what the movie was about, in addition to it lacking much of a plot to begin with.
This movie is definitely not a waste of money or anything, you could just buy a ticket for the stunning scenes and you'd be satisfied. It's just that this movie was quite a disappointment compared to many people's expectations I think, seeing as it basically is just a setup for the upcoming movies, which lacks a good plot.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Animales fantásticos: Los crímenes de Grindelwald
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 200.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 159.555.901 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 62.163.104 USD
- 18 nov 2018
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 655.755.901 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 14 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.39 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti