The Secrets of Emily Blair
- 2016
- 1h 35min
VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,1/10
1412
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaDesperate to save his fiancee from a demon that has possessed her soul, a man turns to his longtime priest for help.Desperate to save his fiancee from a demon that has possessed her soul, a man turns to his longtime priest for help.Desperate to save his fiancee from a demon that has possessed her soul, a man turns to his longtime priest for help.
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe last name of Emily is Blair, and her fiance's last name is Regan which are references to the actress Linda Blair who plays Regan the girl who is possessed in "The Exorcist".
- BlooperWhen Emily starts the procedure for drawing blood from the homeless man, she is wearing blue latex gloves. In the following shot, when she is wrapping the tube around his arm, she has no gloves on. When she reaches for the syringe, the gloves are back on.
- Curiosità sui creditiThere is a post credit scene involving Roizman.
- ConnessioniReferences L'esorcista (1973)
Recensione in evidenza
I am not ever sure why I gave this movie a shot—so many exorcism movies are just retreads of other, better movies. Perhaps it was the length (only about 90 minutes). Perhaps it was a few of the stars, like Colm Meaney, Adrain Paul and Tom Wright—all so very good. Whatever the reason it was a huge waste of time.
I try not to write bad reviews, but this film really was terrible. I kept falling asleep. It was full of action, lots and lots of the possessed star—Ellen Hollman as Emily Blair—acting like a demon and starling and hissing, and lots of gore too. But it was just silly, and despite all the stuff that was going on, I was bored to tears. Even the actors I mentioned above were sub-par, which is sad, because they are such good actors. Maybe it was the directing by Joseph P. Genier? Or was it simply that the script was so bad that no one, not director or stars, could do anything with it? So blasé. So stereotypical. So sensationalistic. Right down to the part where Meaney, as the priest, tells Emily Blair's husband that the church just doesn't do exorcisms anymore.
I wonder how they got Larry Drake—the John Doe of the film in a very small part—to be in this? To do his first film in years? He was actually kind of scary, but he is in and out of the film way too fast for our own good.
Please don't waste your time on this movie. Because it really is a waste of time. How sad.
I try not to write bad reviews, but this film really was terrible. I kept falling asleep. It was full of action, lots and lots of the possessed star—Ellen Hollman as Emily Blair—acting like a demon and starling and hissing, and lots of gore too. But it was just silly, and despite all the stuff that was going on, I was bored to tears. Even the actors I mentioned above were sub-par, which is sad, because they are such good actors. Maybe it was the directing by Joseph P. Genier? Or was it simply that the script was so bad that no one, not director or stars, could do anything with it? So blasé. So stereotypical. So sensationalistic. Right down to the part where Meaney, as the priest, tells Emily Blair's husband that the church just doesn't do exorcisms anymore.
I wonder how they got Larry Drake—the John Doe of the film in a very small part—to be in this? To do his first film in years? He was actually kind of scary, but he is in and out of the film way too fast for our own good.
Please don't waste your time on this movie. Because it really is a waste of time. How sad.
- bgthomaswriter
- 26 ott 2016
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Secrets of Emily Blair?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 35 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was The Secrets of Emily Blair (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi