VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,5/10
3705
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un ex tossicodipendente si unisce a una troupe documentaristica che intervista tre persone che si definiscono mostri reali, scoprendo un'inquietante cospirazione.Un ex tossicodipendente si unisce a una troupe documentaristica che intervista tre persone che si definiscono mostri reali, scoprendo un'inquietante cospirazione.Un ex tossicodipendente si unisce a una troupe documentaristica che intervista tre persone che si definiscono mostri reali, scoprendo un'inquietante cospirazione.
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis movie started as a Kickstarter project. It had a total of 124 backers according to the movie's own credits.
- BlooperOxycontin makes your pupils constrict, not dilate. It is said twice about the opiate addict.
- ConnessioniReferences Dracula (1931)
Recensione in evidenza
I saw the trailer for this film, and I thought the premise was unique, interesting and could potentially yield an entertaining and thoughtfully made film, and I was almost completely right in my assessment. From the onset, the film makes no qualms about what it is trying to achieve. A group of people set out to prove that monsters are real by interviewing 3 people who claim to be real life monsters. It is a premise that writes itself. The acting is competent, and most of the actors are quite talented. The standout of this film, by far, are the special effects. The Skinwalker and the vampire were really well done, and the action scenes were filmed with a competence usually exerted by bigger budget films. It seems like whoever budgeted this movie made it a point to not skimp out on the SFX, and this elevated the film to a much higher standard. I was constantly impressed by some of the make-up and transformations. If more independent movies allocated their funds to SFX, they would produce much more entertaining films. Overall, it is a decent film that does some incredibly clever things that have not been attempted before. If nothing else, people should watch this film just to see an original and unique production. It is a rarity in this age of sequels.
I will end my review with this; The character who played "Jamal" was horrible, offensive, needlessly loud, and entirely stereotypical. Whoever wrote his character should be ashamed of themselves for perpetuating such limited and thoughtless characteristics on any character. Never mind that he was the absolute worst of the entire cast, every time he spoke, it was like nails on a chalkboard. 2 points were removed from my score simply because I hated the character so much. He nearly ruined what was a very decent and entertaining film.
I will end my review with this; The character who played "Jamal" was horrible, offensive, needlessly loud, and entirely stereotypical. Whoever wrote his character should be ashamed of themselves for perpetuating such limited and thoughtless characteristics on any character. Never mind that he was the absolute worst of the entire cast, every time he spoke, it was like nails on a chalkboard. 2 points were removed from my score simply because I hated the character so much. He nearly ruined what was a very decent and entertaining film.
- manuelasaez
- 17 ago 2017
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Monster Project?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 250.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 39 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was The Monster Project (2017) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi