I find myself struggling with films of this nature, where individuals with mental challenges possess an acute awareness of everything except their own reality. Instead of confronting the truth and understanding the reasons behind their disconnection, they use substances to get them even further from the real world and then see the problem in the world we live in blaming it for all the misfortune in their lives.
A new female resident arrives at the rehabilitation center, or whatever term is used, and proclaims, "my problem is women..." However, the true issue lies within her troubled mind and flawed thought processes. The detrimental influence of her environment has penetrated too deeply, leading her to engage in self-destructive behavior while casting blame on others. Furthermore, the characters project an image of coolness, as defined by their peers-an assembly of individuals who have been granted the chance to "express" themselves through the dismantling of anything of value in life. It appears that the film allows these troubled individuals to take control of the narrative.
While the screenplay itself is well-crafted, I believe that Nadine Crocker, as a writer, should pivot towards more uplifting themes that showcase triumph rather than destruction. Although some viewers may empathize with the protagonist, I found it difficult to do so, as the narrative is rife with justifications and excuses. The boyfriend's remark, "Some people just feel more deeply than others..." left me questioning, "What exactly does that mean?"
The director seems to manipulate the audience's emotions, ensuring that by the conclusion, sympathy is directed solely towards the female lead, neglecting the collateral damage inflicted upon others. The character of Dean, portrayed by Crocker, did not elicit my sympathy; rather, she came across as bothersome, fragile, and unkind to those who cared for her. When her friend inquires, "How do we fix it?", Dean's response, "Live..." suggests a lack of direction and thoughtful consideration, raising the question of why different outcomes would be anticipated.
The ending felt like an attempt to sweeten the bitterness of the rest of the movie, and I am not sure that Nadine Crocker managed to do it. I understand this film as disappointing brainwashing for unsuspected.
