Un minatore diventa ricco dopo che un alieno proveniente dalla stella Algol gli dà una macchina a moto perpetuo.Un minatore diventa ricco dopo che un alieno proveniente dalla stella Algol gli dà una macchina a moto perpetuo.Un minatore diventa ricco dopo che un alieno proveniente dalla stella Algol gli dà una macchina a moto perpetuo.
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe film takes place from 1920 to 1940.
- Citazioni
Magda Herne: Your wife is dead, your son your enemy, your daughter far from you. Has rulership of the Earth made you happy?
Recensione in evidenza
Beautiful art direction, okay acting, but disgusting manipulative MARXIST script that's really shows the region and time when this movie came out; spoiler alert for the people in the 1920's, communism/socialism never worked.
The film is against capitalism and technological advancement and it makes that clear since the very beginning by presenting those elements as a "gift from the Devil" to our protagonist in the shape of a machine that produces unlimited energy; but the film has one fatal flaw, it shoots itself on the foot with how it presents its own message. It completely fails to show communists/socialists on a positive light, though it thinks it does.
The world in the film is divided in two sides, the one that embraced capitalism and technological advancement, and the other smaller one that embraced communism/socialism and rejected the technological advance.
All the characters in the communist/socialist side of the world are conformists that make sure that everyone else is a conformist too, or else they cast them away; as they did to our protagonist; a miner, casted away by his own wife once he wanted to start using his gift to IMPROVE THE LIVING CONDITIONS of humanity, including his own and hers. After the capitalist side prospered for 20 years the socialist side became more selfish, resentful, jealous, and entitled. They had the oportunity to be part of the rest of the world but they rejected their offer because the technological advancement would cost them their job at the coil mine, despite they were clearly tired of it since the very beginning and thought they were being exploited.
*Tip for communist/socialist writers: if you think is wrong to replace human workers with machines, don't show them working on DANGEROUS and MISERABLE conditions that they don't want to go through neither.
So, after 20 years of misery in the communist side, they realized that they needed that technology after all, but they couldn't pay for it as the rest of the world did because they were 20 years behind them; echonomically and technologicaly, thanks to their choice of rejecting it when it was offered in the first place, so now they demanded it for FREE. They called our protagonist "selfish" and said that he had the "obligation" of giving it not only to them but to everyone for free, and if he didn't give it for FREE they threatened him with destroying it so NO ONE in the world could have it. Are they suppossed to be the movie's """"heroes"""?
Meanwhile during the whole film, nobody in the "capitalist" side of the world looked poor, nor miserable, nor being exploited, nor being exploiting the communist side of the world, everyone looked happy and prospering. And the protagonist who is the main representative of capitalism remained rational and positive until almost the very end, because that hit the fan once the communists/socialists took over.
Oh, and in another attempt to make people believe that capitalism is synonym with blind greed on top of "evil"; his son wanted to kill him in order to inherit the energy business and be able to get in bed with a gold digger that put him that condition. That's not capitalism, but if we want count it as such that makes one bad capitalist character against millions of good ones, versus hordes and hordes of destructive communists/socialists, so no check mate for their advocates.
There are two main messages that this film communicates regardless were intended or not: 1- Power and progress are "evil".
2 - Don't seek to improve your own life or the life of others, just wait until others improve their their lives, then take away the product of their effort and somehow that would make you a "better person".
I only give 1 star to movies I think should be destroyed and erased from memory, but this one gets 2 because of its pretty art department, and because it needs to be preserved as part of an embarrasing part of history that needs to be studied in order to never repeat it.
The lesson to learn: Political/ideological propaganda in entertainment ages as good as milk ages in a broken refrigerator.
PS. If you watched Francis Ford Coppola's "Megalopolis" you can see this movie had a strong influence in his script; which is arguably as bad as this one.
The film is against capitalism and technological advancement and it makes that clear since the very beginning by presenting those elements as a "gift from the Devil" to our protagonist in the shape of a machine that produces unlimited energy; but the film has one fatal flaw, it shoots itself on the foot with how it presents its own message. It completely fails to show communists/socialists on a positive light, though it thinks it does.
The world in the film is divided in two sides, the one that embraced capitalism and technological advancement, and the other smaller one that embraced communism/socialism and rejected the technological advance.
All the characters in the communist/socialist side of the world are conformists that make sure that everyone else is a conformist too, or else they cast them away; as they did to our protagonist; a miner, casted away by his own wife once he wanted to start using his gift to IMPROVE THE LIVING CONDITIONS of humanity, including his own and hers. After the capitalist side prospered for 20 years the socialist side became more selfish, resentful, jealous, and entitled. They had the oportunity to be part of the rest of the world but they rejected their offer because the technological advancement would cost them their job at the coil mine, despite they were clearly tired of it since the very beginning and thought they were being exploited.
*Tip for communist/socialist writers: if you think is wrong to replace human workers with machines, don't show them working on DANGEROUS and MISERABLE conditions that they don't want to go through neither.
So, after 20 years of misery in the communist side, they realized that they needed that technology after all, but they couldn't pay for it as the rest of the world did because they were 20 years behind them; echonomically and technologicaly, thanks to their choice of rejecting it when it was offered in the first place, so now they demanded it for FREE. They called our protagonist "selfish" and said that he had the "obligation" of giving it not only to them but to everyone for free, and if he didn't give it for FREE they threatened him with destroying it so NO ONE in the world could have it. Are they suppossed to be the movie's """"heroes"""?
Meanwhile during the whole film, nobody in the "capitalist" side of the world looked poor, nor miserable, nor being exploited, nor being exploiting the communist side of the world, everyone looked happy and prospering. And the protagonist who is the main representative of capitalism remained rational and positive until almost the very end, because that hit the fan once the communists/socialists took over.
Oh, and in another attempt to make people believe that capitalism is synonym with blind greed on top of "evil"; his son wanted to kill him in order to inherit the energy business and be able to get in bed with a gold digger that put him that condition. That's not capitalism, but if we want count it as such that makes one bad capitalist character against millions of good ones, versus hordes and hordes of destructive communists/socialists, so no check mate for their advocates.
There are two main messages that this film communicates regardless were intended or not: 1- Power and progress are "evil".
2 - Don't seek to improve your own life or the life of others, just wait until others improve their their lives, then take away the product of their effort and somehow that would make you a "better person".
I only give 1 star to movies I think should be destroyed and erased from memory, but this one gets 2 because of its pretty art department, and because it needs to be preserved as part of an embarrasing part of history that needs to be studied in order to never repeat it.
The lesson to learn: Political/ideological propaganda in entertainment ages as good as milk ages in a broken refrigerator.
PS. If you watched Francis Ford Coppola's "Megalopolis" you can see this movie had a strong influence in his script; which is arguably as bad as this one.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 39 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.33 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Algol - Tragödie der Macht (1920) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi