VALUTAZIONE IMDb
8,2/10
17.882
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
La storia segue la vita della famiglia Borgen, che deve affrontare contrasti interni ma anche conflitti religiosi al suo interno e con il resto del paese.La storia segue la vita della famiglia Borgen, che deve affrontare contrasti interni ma anche conflitti religiosi al suo interno e con il resto del paese.La storia segue la vita della famiglia Borgen, che deve affrontare contrasti interni ma anche conflitti religiosi al suo interno e con il resto del paese.
- Premi
- 7 vittorie e 2 candidature
Henrik Malberg
- Morten Borgen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Emil Hass Christensen
- Mikkel Borgen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Preben Lerdorff Rye
- Johannes Borgen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Hanne Aagesen
- Karen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Sylvia Eckhausen
- Kirstin Petersen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Birgitte Federspiel
- Inger Borgen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Ejner Federspiel
- Peter Petersen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Ann Elisabeth Groth
- Maren Borgen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Cay Kristiansen
- Anders Borgen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Gerda Nielsen
- Anne Petersen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Susanne Rud
- Lilleinger Borgen
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Henry Skjær
- The Doctor
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Edith Trane
- Mette Maren
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThe actress who plays Inger had the audio of herself in labor and it was used during the difficult birth scene in the movie.
- Citazioni
Inger Borgen: I believe a lot of little miracles happen secretly.
- ConnessioniEdited into Histoire(s) du cinéma: Une histoire seule (1989)
Recensione in evidenza
Others have reviewed this picture in a more scholarly and contextual manner than I can, so I will only endeavor to add the following:
I have a particular interest in the nature of faith, and undertook to view Ordet as something "good for me," but probably arduous. Wrong! I also grew up in an area heavily populated by Scandinavians, and knew immigrants who were contemporaries of the oldest characters in the picture.
Ordet, set in 1925, is a dead-on take of old-school Scandinavian culture, suffused with both the most intense dramatic elements imaginable and moments of comic relief as well. The action moves right along without help of special effects or a distracting musical score.
This picture at least alludes to the seldom-asked question, "Why do people believe?" Is it merely for the rewards of faithfulness, or something more?
The final scene, utterly devoid of effects or music, has a dramatic power unexcelled in the ensuing 47 years of cinema to date. It is very long, but uses its duration in service of the tension of the story. Nobody is yelling, fighting or firing weapons, despite the fact they are enduring emotional torment that is as painful as it gets.
In an oblique way, the scene reminded me of the part of Jim Jarmusch's "Down By Law" where Tom Waits and Co. are sitting in the clink in real time, and time passes glacially in one very long scene, illustrating the sheer boredom of incarcerated life. Here real time is used to illustrate the unrelenting nature of grief. In both cases we see what happens long after the scene would have changed in nearly any other picture. The pace conforms plausibly with real life, and in so doing serves the dramatic tension.
One negative review alludes to the final shot and the expression in a character's eyes. I would defend that as an insight that no blessing is unmixed.
As others have noted, one needn't hold a Christian point of view to enjoy this film and be given much to ponder. See it.
I have a particular interest in the nature of faith, and undertook to view Ordet as something "good for me," but probably arduous. Wrong! I also grew up in an area heavily populated by Scandinavians, and knew immigrants who were contemporaries of the oldest characters in the picture.
Ordet, set in 1925, is a dead-on take of old-school Scandinavian culture, suffused with both the most intense dramatic elements imaginable and moments of comic relief as well. The action moves right along without help of special effects or a distracting musical score.
This picture at least alludes to the seldom-asked question, "Why do people believe?" Is it merely for the rewards of faithfulness, or something more?
The final scene, utterly devoid of effects or music, has a dramatic power unexcelled in the ensuing 47 years of cinema to date. It is very long, but uses its duration in service of the tension of the story. Nobody is yelling, fighting or firing weapons, despite the fact they are enduring emotional torment that is as painful as it gets.
In an oblique way, the scene reminded me of the part of Jim Jarmusch's "Down By Law" where Tom Waits and Co. are sitting in the clink in real time, and time passes glacially in one very long scene, illustrating the sheer boredom of incarcerated life. Here real time is used to illustrate the unrelenting nature of grief. In both cases we see what happens long after the scene would have changed in nearly any other picture. The pace conforms plausibly with real life, and in so doing serves the dramatic tension.
One negative review alludes to the final shot and the expression in a character's eyes. I would defend that as an insight that no blessing is unmixed.
As others have noted, one needn't hold a Christian point of view to enjoy this film and be given much to ponder. See it.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 6 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Ordet - La parola (1955) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi