VALUTAZIONE IMDb
8,0/10
36.850
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Il potente editorialista di Broadway J.J. Hunsecker costringe Sidney Falco, agente stampa senza scrupoli, a rompere la storia d'amore di sua sorella con un musicista jazz.Il potente editorialista di Broadway J.J. Hunsecker costringe Sidney Falco, agente stampa senza scrupoli, a rompere la storia d'amore di sua sorella con un musicista jazz.Il potente editorialista di Broadway J.J. Hunsecker costringe Sidney Falco, agente stampa senza scrupoli, a rompere la storia d'amore di sua sorella con un musicista jazz.
- Nominato ai 1 BAFTA Award
- 3 vittorie e 3 candidature totali
Martin Milner
- Steve Dallas
- (as Marty Milner)
Chico Hamilton
- Self
- (as The Chico Hamilton Quintet)
Buddy Clark
- Self
- (as The Chico Hamilton Quintet)
Jay Adler
- Manny Davis
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Mary Bayless
- Bar Patron
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Nicky Blair
- Patron at Toots Shor's
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Nick Borgani
- Waiter
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizPublicity materials for the film noted cinematographer James Wong Howe spread a film of Vaseline on Lancaster's glasses to create a shine and make his stare more menacing.
- Blooper(at around 2 mins) When Sidney peruses J.J. Hunsecker's 'The Eyes of Broadway' column on page 21 of the New York Globe newspaper, it can be seen that several of the paragraphs are repeated. Of the nine paragraphs visible, it can be seen that paragraph 7 is an exact copy of paragraph 2; 8 is a copy of 5, and 9 is a copy of 4.
- Citazioni
J.J. Hunsecker: I'd hate to take a bite outta you. You're a cookie full of arsenic.
- Curiosità sui creditiintroducing Susan Harrison
- ConnessioniFeatured in Mackendrick: The Man Who Walked Away (1986)
Recensione in evidenza
There are three reasons that movie fans should check this film out, if you haven't seen it yet:
1 - Outstanding dialog. I can't recall a film in which I heard so many clever film-noir lines as this one. Almost everyone in the movie has a unique way of expressing their feelings. It makes the movie one that you want to go back and HEAR again. Clifford Odets and Ernest Lehman wrote the screenplay and deserve special recognition as well as the people below.
2 - Fabulous acting, led by the two male leads: Tony Curtis and Burt Lancaster. Curtis is the star of the film with many more lines than anyone else, and many consider this to be his greatest acting achievement. I have no quarrel with that. It's one of the finest acting jobs I've ever witnessed by anyone. It's that good.
Lancaster is memorable and plays to his strengths as a tough guy, not only with his physical presence but his tactless and cutting verbal assaults. He has the best and most brutal lines in the film.
The minor characters in here, from the cop to the comedian to the cigarette girl to the young romantic couple are all top-notch.
3 - The cinematography. A big name in the film business, James Wong Howe, more than lives up to his reputation. This is beautifully photographed and looks absolutely stunning on DVD. I have watched hundreds and hundreds of black-and-white films and this ranks with the best of them. He captured nighttime New York City as well as anybody ever has done.
"Well," you might ask, "if this movie is so great, why haven't I heard more about it?"
Maybe because it never did well at the box office. It wasn't promoted a lot, from what I heard, and the storyline is not a pleasant one. Basically, this is about two immoral people who smear a nice guy so that it will ruin the romance between he and Lancaster's sister.
Lancaster plays an absolutely ruthless newspaper columnist who makes and breaks careers and Curtis plays his slimy press-agent who will do anything to please his powerful boss, including doing the worst of his dirty work.
Furrther details of the film can be read by many of the other fine reviewers here on this website, so no need to go into that.
I am not one who generally likes films that feature mostly nasty people but this was done so well that it fascinates me every time. A final tip of the hat to director Alexander Mackendrick. Why he wasn't given more films to direct is a mystery to me. Highly-recommended.
1 - Outstanding dialog. I can't recall a film in which I heard so many clever film-noir lines as this one. Almost everyone in the movie has a unique way of expressing their feelings. It makes the movie one that you want to go back and HEAR again. Clifford Odets and Ernest Lehman wrote the screenplay and deserve special recognition as well as the people below.
2 - Fabulous acting, led by the two male leads: Tony Curtis and Burt Lancaster. Curtis is the star of the film with many more lines than anyone else, and many consider this to be his greatest acting achievement. I have no quarrel with that. It's one of the finest acting jobs I've ever witnessed by anyone. It's that good.
Lancaster is memorable and plays to his strengths as a tough guy, not only with his physical presence but his tactless and cutting verbal assaults. He has the best and most brutal lines in the film.
The minor characters in here, from the cop to the comedian to the cigarette girl to the young romantic couple are all top-notch.
3 - The cinematography. A big name in the film business, James Wong Howe, more than lives up to his reputation. This is beautifully photographed and looks absolutely stunning on DVD. I have watched hundreds and hundreds of black-and-white films and this ranks with the best of them. He captured nighttime New York City as well as anybody ever has done.
"Well," you might ask, "if this movie is so great, why haven't I heard more about it?"
Maybe because it never did well at the box office. It wasn't promoted a lot, from what I heard, and the storyline is not a pleasant one. Basically, this is about two immoral people who smear a nice guy so that it will ruin the romance between he and Lancaster's sister.
Lancaster plays an absolutely ruthless newspaper columnist who makes and breaks careers and Curtis plays his slimy press-agent who will do anything to please his powerful boss, including doing the worst of his dirty work.
Furrther details of the film can be read by many of the other fine reviewers here on this website, so no need to go into that.
I am not one who generally likes films that feature mostly nasty people but this was done so well that it fascinates me every time. A final tip of the hat to director Alexander Mackendrick. Why he wasn't given more films to direct is a mystery to me. Highly-recommended.
- ccthemovieman-1
- 23 giu 2005
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Sweet Smell of Success?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Sweet Smell of Success
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 3.400.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 7.704 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 36 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.66 : 1(original ratio)
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Piombo rovente (1957) officially released in India in Hindi?
Rispondi