VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,8/10
505
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA single doctor about to be awarded a knighthood for his claim of curing tuberculosis is infatuated by a woman's beauty and charm, promising to save her husband's life, only to change his mi... Leggi tuttoA single doctor about to be awarded a knighthood for his claim of curing tuberculosis is infatuated by a woman's beauty and charm, promising to save her husband's life, only to change his mind after discovering the man's immoral character.A single doctor about to be awarded a knighthood for his claim of curing tuberculosis is infatuated by a woman's beauty and charm, promising to save her husband's life, only to change his mind after discovering the man's immoral character.
Joan Benham
- Visitor at Art Exhibition
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Victor Harrington
- Passer-by
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Frederick Kelsey
- Visitor at Art Exhibition
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizThis movie was a flop at the box-office, resulting in a loss for MGM of two hundred ninety-nine thousand dollars (2.57 million dollars in 2017) according to studio records.
- BlooperAt a time when all women wore their hair up, Leslie Caron would have been thought immoral or mad to be wearing her hair down to her shoulders.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Film Profile: Dirk Bogarde (1961)
Recensione in evidenza
It's the turn of the 20th century in England in this film based on George Bernard Shaw's 1906 play of the same title. While I read some of Shaw in literature classes, I didn't read "The Doctor's Dilemma." So, how much different the screenplay may be from the stage play, I can't say. In spite of a tremendous cast of the day and a top director, with all the elaborate trappings by MGM for a brilliant production in color, this film flopped in Britain and the U. S. And the reason seems obvious.
The film is billed as a comedy and drama, and the latter doesn't work with the former in this film. Had Shaw and/or the screen writers stuck to one theme throughout - satire of the medical profession, this could have been a very good and funny movie. Indeed, the doctors provide most of the humor. But there is far too little of it, especially for the likes of Alastair Sim and Robert Morley. Instead, though, the plot gives much time and attention to the roles played by the leads, Dirk Bogarde and Leslie Caron. And, while Bogarde had proved his talent for comedy, the character he plays here, Louis Dubedat, is not at all funny. And, but for the presence of Caron's physical beauty, she adds nothing to the comedy herself. Her role is a piece of the plot that is also exploited for humor - but it's so weak as to be negligible.
One suspects that the film fairly closely follows Shaw's play, with his obvious disdain for conventional morality in the portrayal of the young leading roles. But that's precisely what does this film in. It was a gamble, going for the glamorous leading people at the time, who obviously wouldn't be playing minor roles to the older actors. But in that gamble, MGM missed an opportunity to have a very good smashing comedy and satire about doctors, and the medical profession in England. It just meant focusing much more on that and much less on the social mores.
No one could miss the points by Bogarde's Dubedat - his scorn of the conventional culture and moral standards. But where is the clever dialog there, and where are the funny lines? And how funny is it that he was a bigamist? And that Caron's character didn't seem to care about that? Or that this otherwise talented painter was a thief and cad? It really paints her as quite strange, if not an out and out floozie. Again, this plot tries to deal with two big ticket themes, but does itself in because of that. The result was a very colorful-looking product with much wasted talent, in an errant screenplay that assured it of flopping with the public.
The bottom line for me -- with the likes of Alastair Sim, Robert Morley, and others of this cast in a supposed comedy and satire, is lots of laughs, chuckles and smiles. But for a few lines by the doctors - mostly in the beginning, this film was void of humor. Here are the best of the small number of good lines.
Sir Patrick Cullen, in the opening voice over of himself walking on Harley Street, "Harley Street - the home of the medical profession... Here they all are - the good and the bad. And the surgeons are the worst. They've found out that a man's body is full of bits and scraps of old organs he's no use for. You can cut half a dozen of 'em out directly and he wouldn't be the worse, except for the illness and the guineas it cost him."
Sir Patrick Cullen, voice over when looking at a maid cleaning a doctor's fence sign, "I know him. He used to snip off the ends of uvulas for 50 guineas."
Sir Colenso Ridgeon, "Oh, Dr. Blenkinsop, I can't bear it The most tragic thing in the world is a sick doctor."
Sir Ralph Bloomfield-Bonington, "Oh, I say, you have got your knife into him, haven't you?" Cutler Walpole, "I wish I had. Yes, I'd make a better man of you."
Cutler Walpole, "Oh, I sent you a paper the other day, about a thing I invented - a new saw, for shoulder blades." Sir Patrick Cullen, "Yes, I got it. It's a good saw. Very useful. Handy, useful." Walpole, "Yes, I knew you'd see its points." Sir Patrick, "I remember that saw 65 years ago." Walpole, "What?" Sir Patrick, "It was called a cabinet maker's jimmy, then."
Cutler Walpole, "95% of the human race suffer from chronic blood poisoning and die of it. Simple as A, B, C."
Cutler Walpole, "I was so upset, I, I forgot to take the sponges out." Chuckling, "There I was, stitching her up, and one of the nurses..."
The film is billed as a comedy and drama, and the latter doesn't work with the former in this film. Had Shaw and/or the screen writers stuck to one theme throughout - satire of the medical profession, this could have been a very good and funny movie. Indeed, the doctors provide most of the humor. But there is far too little of it, especially for the likes of Alastair Sim and Robert Morley. Instead, though, the plot gives much time and attention to the roles played by the leads, Dirk Bogarde and Leslie Caron. And, while Bogarde had proved his talent for comedy, the character he plays here, Louis Dubedat, is not at all funny. And, but for the presence of Caron's physical beauty, she adds nothing to the comedy herself. Her role is a piece of the plot that is also exploited for humor - but it's so weak as to be negligible.
One suspects that the film fairly closely follows Shaw's play, with his obvious disdain for conventional morality in the portrayal of the young leading roles. But that's precisely what does this film in. It was a gamble, going for the glamorous leading people at the time, who obviously wouldn't be playing minor roles to the older actors. But in that gamble, MGM missed an opportunity to have a very good smashing comedy and satire about doctors, and the medical profession in England. It just meant focusing much more on that and much less on the social mores.
No one could miss the points by Bogarde's Dubedat - his scorn of the conventional culture and moral standards. But where is the clever dialog there, and where are the funny lines? And how funny is it that he was a bigamist? And that Caron's character didn't seem to care about that? Or that this otherwise talented painter was a thief and cad? It really paints her as quite strange, if not an out and out floozie. Again, this plot tries to deal with two big ticket themes, but does itself in because of that. The result was a very colorful-looking product with much wasted talent, in an errant screenplay that assured it of flopping with the public.
The bottom line for me -- with the likes of Alastair Sim, Robert Morley, and others of this cast in a supposed comedy and satire, is lots of laughs, chuckles and smiles. But for a few lines by the doctors - mostly in the beginning, this film was void of humor. Here are the best of the small number of good lines.
Sir Patrick Cullen, in the opening voice over of himself walking on Harley Street, "Harley Street - the home of the medical profession... Here they all are - the good and the bad. And the surgeons are the worst. They've found out that a man's body is full of bits and scraps of old organs he's no use for. You can cut half a dozen of 'em out directly and he wouldn't be the worse, except for the illness and the guineas it cost him."
Sir Patrick Cullen, voice over when looking at a maid cleaning a doctor's fence sign, "I know him. He used to snip off the ends of uvulas for 50 guineas."
Sir Colenso Ridgeon, "Oh, Dr. Blenkinsop, I can't bear it The most tragic thing in the world is a sick doctor."
Sir Ralph Bloomfield-Bonington, "Oh, I say, you have got your knife into him, haven't you?" Cutler Walpole, "I wish I had. Yes, I'd make a better man of you."
Cutler Walpole, "Oh, I sent you a paper the other day, about a thing I invented - a new saw, for shoulder blades." Sir Patrick Cullen, "Yes, I got it. It's a good saw. Very useful. Handy, useful." Walpole, "Yes, I knew you'd see its points." Sir Patrick, "I remember that saw 65 years ago." Walpole, "What?" Sir Patrick, "It was called a cabinet maker's jimmy, then."
Cutler Walpole, "95% of the human race suffer from chronic blood poisoning and die of it. Simple as A, B, C."
Cutler Walpole, "I was so upset, I, I forgot to take the sponges out." Chuckling, "There I was, stitching her up, and one of the nurses..."
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Arzt am Scheideweg
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 576.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 39 minuti
- Proporzioni
- 1.66 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Il dilemma del dottore (1958) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi