VALUTAZIONE IMDb
5,9/10
2733
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un giovane uomo afflitto dal dolore si unisce a una squadra di football a sei giocatori, trovando conforto in un compagno di squadra, sua madre amorevole e l'allenatore che lo ha reclutato.Un giovane uomo afflitto dal dolore si unisce a una squadra di football a sei giocatori, trovando conforto in un compagno di squadra, sua madre amorevole e l'allenatore che lo ha reclutato.Un giovane uomo afflitto dal dolore si unisce a una squadra di football a sei giocatori, trovando conforto in un compagno di squadra, sua madre amorevole e l'allenatore che lo ha reclutato.
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 2 candidature
John Henry Marshall
- Matt Kibbs
- (as John Henry Marshall III)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizScreenplay was developed in the Sundance Lab.
- BlooperThe microphone that the yodeling band gather round is a Sennheiser MD441, which has a tight, end-on pickup pattern. Singing into it sideways as they are, the would hardly have been picked up.
- Citazioni
Roy Chutney: My father told me if I was hard enough, I wouldn't break. He lied. Everything breaks.
- ConnessioniFeatured in The 2003 IFP Independent Spirit Awards (2003)
Recensione in evidenza
As a subscriber to Sundance Channel, I am intrigued by recurrent programming patterns in the films shown. Recently, for example, there has been a spate of male-oriented psycho-sexual dramas that go deeply into themes usually represented in mainstream cinema as subconscious or accidental phenomena.
In The Slaughter Rule as well as other recent offerings like L.I.E. or Priest or Taboo (originally Gohatto), characters reveal emotions that seem designed specifically to break new ground in the amorphic area between ordinary storytelling and what some would call pornography. The common word to describe this is "disturbing." But just as Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf, Midnight Cowboy, and Harold and Maude opened people's eyes in the 60's and 70's to the possibilities of "disturbing" cinema as literature, these new films may lead in my view to an entirely new public attitude about the inherent validity of the effort.
To be sure, The Slaughter Rule is a flawed film. So are many others of its kind to date. Its premise, however, is sound. One can nitpick about cinematic values, geographical anomalies, or plot distractions, etc., but to be able to see disparate fictional characters get under each other's skin is what makes any drama come to life. Added to that in this case is a very competent job of producing, directing, and editing. Moreover, no one can quarrel with the acting performance of David Morse.
Coming to grips with overtly sexual themes in films -- particularly those that deal seriously with "disturbing" but very real kinds of human emotions -- is a challenging task not only for moviemakers like the Smiths, but also for viewers. I give this movie an "E" for effort and a solid 9 out of 10 for everything else.
In The Slaughter Rule as well as other recent offerings like L.I.E. or Priest or Taboo (originally Gohatto), characters reveal emotions that seem designed specifically to break new ground in the amorphic area between ordinary storytelling and what some would call pornography. The common word to describe this is "disturbing." But just as Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf, Midnight Cowboy, and Harold and Maude opened people's eyes in the 60's and 70's to the possibilities of "disturbing" cinema as literature, these new films may lead in my view to an entirely new public attitude about the inherent validity of the effort.
To be sure, The Slaughter Rule is a flawed film. So are many others of its kind to date. Its premise, however, is sound. One can nitpick about cinematic values, geographical anomalies, or plot distractions, etc., but to be able to see disparate fictional characters get under each other's skin is what makes any drama come to life. Added to that in this case is a very competent job of producing, directing, and editing. Moreover, no one can quarrel with the acting performance of David Morse.
Coming to grips with overtly sexual themes in films -- particularly those that deal seriously with "disturbing" but very real kinds of human emotions -- is a challenging task not only for moviemakers like the Smiths, but also for viewers. I give this movie an "E" for effort and a solid 9 out of 10 for everything else.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Slaughter Rule?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 500.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 13.411 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 1.461 USD
- 12 gen 2003
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 13.411 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 52 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was The Slaughter Rule (2002) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi