La novellista Catherine Tramell è di nuovo nei guai con la legge e Scotland Yard nomina lo psichiatra Dott. Michael Glass per valutarla. Proprio come il detective Nick Curran prima di lui, G... Leggi tuttoLa novellista Catherine Tramell è di nuovo nei guai con la legge e Scotland Yard nomina lo psichiatra Dott. Michael Glass per valutarla. Proprio come il detective Nick Curran prima di lui, Glass diventa affascinato da Tramell e attirato in un gioco di seduzione.La novellista Catherine Tramell è di nuovo nei guai con la legge e Scotland Yard nomina lo psichiatra Dott. Michael Glass per valutarla. Proprio come il detective Nick Curran prima di lui, Glass diventa affascinato da Tramell e attirato in un gioco di seduzione.
- Premi
- 8 vittorie e 6 candidature
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWhen the sequel was originally being planned in 2000 Michael Douglas declined to reprise his role as Nick Curran, admitting there were also issues regarding his age.
- Blooper(at around 1h 35 mins) When Michael Glass gives Washburn Milena's street address in a telephone message, he clearly says 23. When Michael gets to her house, the number above the door is 14.
- Citazioni
Roy Washburn: What were you doing at 100 miles per hour?
Catherine Tramell: He was making me cum. And it was 110. We must've hit a pothole.
Roy Washburn: Kevin Franks died. You don't seem very worried.
Catherine Tramell: I'm devastated... I may never cum again.
- Versioni alternativeAs with the first film, the US version was cut in the sex scenes because the MPAA threatened the film with a NC-17 rating.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: The Worst of 2006 (2007)
- Colonne sonoreTheme
From the Motion Picture Basic Instinct (1992)
Written by Jerry Goldsmith
Published by Le StudioCanal+ Music, Inc. (BMI)
Our story here has Ms. Tramell, notorious author from Basic Instinct at the epicenter of a death, accidental, or perhaps...intentional??? She is handled by Scotland yard in this one, a far cry from the San Fransisco PD and Detective Nick Curan, who is sorely absent. Rather than prance around with her sexuality tugging at the police, and seducing them blindly, she is more a bully here, and she pushes authoritative figures, especially Michael Glass the professional assigned to her case, into her game this time around.
Sharon Stone turns in a mostly witty and sharp (no pun intended) continuation of Catherine Tramell, Complete with incomparable physique, sexy sultry voice, and some more blonde poison. Her co-stars, however, do not measure up.U.K. veteran Charlotte Rampling is the only other cast member/character on Stones level. The rest of the cast are like fish out of water. I think it's part of why the film doesn't work. We have very stiff European authoritative figures, bent on the unraveling of the case, as well they should be, except it doesn't feel like Basic Instinct, and the good moments that are had, are reminders that it might have been better had they stuck with the original idea which was to have been set in NYC.
The production design and art direction are diabolical though (again, no pun intended), and it's a scene set greatly, if only the expectations were met. Ultimately I feel the writing was the biggest let down. It's as if Leora Barish and Henry Bean didn't know the character of Catherine, and thusly could not completely tell her story. Whatever they have for every one else is a more or less lacking shadow of what the original was.
Michael Caton-Jones is okay, but this flick, released in 2006, looks like EVERY other action thriller from that time period, and that's sad. The original was a cut (there I go again)above the rest of what was released back in 1992. It had so much style and charisma, and even charm, mixed with an extremely interwoven and complex, even abstract plot/story. This is just a run-of-the-mill follow up sequel that is as bland and boring as every other product that was churned out by studios at the time. It's all in your face at value, which is not very high. There is noting beyond the cheese & crackers. The cigar is just the cigar, and in this films case, it needed to be a highly intoxicating cigarette.
- doorbomb62
- 30 giu 2015
- Permalink
I più visti
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paesi di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Basic Instinct 2: Risk Addiction
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 70.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 5.971.336 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 3.201.420 USD
- 2 apr 2006
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 38.629.478 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 54 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1