Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaProfessor Bernard Quatermass' manned rocket ship returns to Earth but two of the astronauts are missing and the survivor seems ill and unable to communicate.Professor Bernard Quatermass' manned rocket ship returns to Earth but two of the astronauts are missing and the survivor seems ill and unable to communicate.Professor Bernard Quatermass' manned rocket ship returns to Earth but two of the astronauts are missing and the survivor seems ill and unable to communicate.
Andrew Tiernan
- Victor Carroon
- (as Andy Tiernan)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizDuring the rehearsals for the film, David Tennant was offered the role of the Tenth Doctor in Doctor Who (2005). This casting was not announced to the public until April 16, 2005, two weeks after the broadcast, but his fellow castmembers, and crew, became aware of the speculation surrounding Tennant. In the live broadcast, Jason Flemyng changed Quatermass' first line to Tennant's character Dr. Gordon Briscoe from "Good to have you back, Gordon" to "Good to have you back, Doctor" as a deliberate reference.
- BlooperWhen they show Victor the film in the hospital, we are looking through the transparent screen towards Victor. But the countdown numbers at the start of the film appear the right way round to us so they'd be the wrong way round for those watching from the other side of the screen.
- Versioni alternativeThe 2005 Simply Home Entertainment DVD release contains over 50 small or major differences, notably Adrian Bower's line-drying being replaced with the tech rehearsal sequence prerecorded from the previous night (52:02), and the removal of a loud offscreen crash following an exit from Adrian Dunbar (1:07:49). The strapline "Major news announcement on BBC NEWS 24 now" (alerting viewers to the death of Pope John Paul II) is another noticeable if understandable omission.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Doctor Who Confidential: The Writer's Tale (2006)
Recensione in evidenza
Back in the 60's and 70's, studio-based sci-fi dramas were made and devoured by a mainstream audience. At some point that audience became a "cult" audience. (Probably as a result of the ever-so-hip 80's changing societal attitudes) Those dramas represent the very best that television sci-fi had to offer, even on low budgets, shot on video with 16mm film inserts. They were flawed, and still we loved it... because we knew how to suspend our disbelief.
Today's breed of programme makers, although largely familiar with the era to which I am referring, have rejected this format, and now have an addiction to making everything look like it was shot on film.
How ironic that a 90 minute LIVE programme was processed to look like it was shot on film..... BADLY.
Coupled with the appalling location work at some disused MOD base ( think), this represented the biggest disappointment of the year so far.
Those of you who liked "Eldorado" would have felt right at home here. Due to the nature of the placing all the locations in a single, huge, concrete building (with the odd exterior from out the same building), there was no sound treatment and everywhere echoed all to hell.
It was OBVIOUSLY the same building no matter where you looked, and that ruined it for me utterly. That and the fact that it SEEMED to be live..... no sense of time passing was communicated at all.
No effects, no risks, no fun.
Some of the lead performances were excellent, but a good many were stagey and forced. I expect the pressure of a live broadcast rattled some of the actors.
The live episodes of Coronation Street and The Bill recently were more believable than this.
What a complete waste of time, money and effort! 1/10
Today's breed of programme makers, although largely familiar with the era to which I am referring, have rejected this format, and now have an addiction to making everything look like it was shot on film.
How ironic that a 90 minute LIVE programme was processed to look like it was shot on film..... BADLY.
Coupled with the appalling location work at some disused MOD base ( think), this represented the biggest disappointment of the year so far.
Those of you who liked "Eldorado" would have felt right at home here. Due to the nature of the placing all the locations in a single, huge, concrete building (with the odd exterior from out the same building), there was no sound treatment and everywhere echoed all to hell.
It was OBVIOUSLY the same building no matter where you looked, and that ruined it for me utterly. That and the fact that it SEEMED to be live..... no sense of time passing was communicated at all.
No effects, no risks, no fun.
Some of the lead performances were excellent, but a good many were stagey and forced. I expect the pressure of a live broadcast rattled some of the actors.
The live episodes of Coronation Street and The Bill recently were more believable than this.
What a complete waste of time, money and effort! 1/10
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Siti ufficiali
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Експеримент Квотермаса
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was The Quatermass Experiment (2005) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi