Romeo e Giulietta si sono sposati segretamente nonostante il disprezzo giurato che le loro famiglie nutrono l'uno per l'altra. Non passerà molto tempo, prima che una catena di eventi fatali ... Leggi tuttoRomeo e Giulietta si sono sposati segretamente nonostante il disprezzo giurato che le loro famiglie nutrono l'uno per l'altra. Non passerà molto tempo, prima che una catena di eventi fatali cambi per sempre la vita di entrambe le famiglie.Romeo e Giulietta si sono sposati segretamente nonostante il disprezzo giurato che le loro famiglie nutrono l'uno per l'altra. Non passerà molto tempo, prima che una catena di eventi fatali cambi per sempre la vita di entrambe le famiglie.
- Premi
- 2 vittorie e 2 candidature totali
Marcus J. Cotterell
- Second Capulet Servant
- (as Marcus Cotterell)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizLily Collins was the original choice for Juliet but dropped out due to scheduling conflicts. Hailee Steinfeld later replaced Collins.
- BlooperJust before the balcony scene Romeo says "He jests at scars that never felt a wound" which is an original line from the play. However, in the play this line is in reference to a series of jests Mercutio shouts at this time about his love for Rosaline. All the jests were cut from the movie, so having Romeo comment about them doesn't make sense.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Weekend Sunrise: Episodio datato 8 febbraio 2014 (2014)
- Colonne sonoreL'Amor Dona Ch'Io Te Porto
Anonymous, late 15th Century
Performed by Ensemble La Rossignol
P 2003 Tactus Records - Licensed by
Machiavelli Music Publishing
Recensione in evidenza
I am in two minds about this film: On the one hand I can honestly say that I enjoyed it and that it swept me away in the timeless love story. On the other hand there are several things that really bothered me and that I believe would disqualify it from being classified a "good" film.
Firstly, the bad:
1) The movie doesn't follow Shakespeare's original text. Sure enough, the most famous lines are all there, but the movie frequently deviates from Shakespeare's text. The simplification of some text insults the intelligence of the audience and does seem a little arrogant on the parts of the screenwriters. It also doesn't help that much of the changes has the feel of modern speech being rewritten in an "old-english-sounding" tongue which clearly stands out from the classic words of the bard. Not even the ending escapes some liberal changes. 2)Hailee Steinfeld is really a bad casting decision for Juliet. She is simply so much younger than Romeo that their on-screen chemistry looks a bit creepy. Her portrayal of Juliet lacks depth and she simply does not possess the beauty to be a Juliet - especially if you pair her with Douglas Booth as Romeo. (Another reviewer complained that Romeo is more beautiful than Juliet in this film and I have to agree that this is true)
Now for the good: 1) Bringing fierceness and intense passion to the role, I thought Douglas Booth was a really good Romeo. 2) Paul Giamatti is excellent as Friar Laurence. He brings some comic relief, lightness and heart to the film. 3) The story is fast-paced, passionate and intense. Enough of Shakespeare's most-loved soliloquies and dialogue appear to retain the timeless beauty of his words. The words still bring layer upon layer of meaning to the story and brings so much depth and emotion to the story of the star-crossed lovers that one can't help but wander at just how Shakespeare was able to get so much emotion into so few lines.
I give this film a score of 7 as I quite enjoyed it despite it's flaws. Don't watch this movie if you have to do a school project on Romeo and Juliet, though!
Firstly, the bad:
1) The movie doesn't follow Shakespeare's original text. Sure enough, the most famous lines are all there, but the movie frequently deviates from Shakespeare's text. The simplification of some text insults the intelligence of the audience and does seem a little arrogant on the parts of the screenwriters. It also doesn't help that much of the changes has the feel of modern speech being rewritten in an "old-english-sounding" tongue which clearly stands out from the classic words of the bard. Not even the ending escapes some liberal changes. 2)Hailee Steinfeld is really a bad casting decision for Juliet. She is simply so much younger than Romeo that their on-screen chemistry looks a bit creepy. Her portrayal of Juliet lacks depth and she simply does not possess the beauty to be a Juliet - especially if you pair her with Douglas Booth as Romeo. (Another reviewer complained that Romeo is more beautiful than Juliet in this film and I have to agree that this is true)
Now for the good: 1) Bringing fierceness and intense passion to the role, I thought Douglas Booth was a really good Romeo. 2) Paul Giamatti is excellent as Friar Laurence. He brings some comic relief, lightness and heart to the film. 3) The story is fast-paced, passionate and intense. Enough of Shakespeare's most-loved soliloquies and dialogue appear to retain the timeless beauty of his words. The words still bring layer upon layer of meaning to the story and brings so much depth and emotion to the story of the star-crossed lovers that one can't help but wander at just how Shakespeare was able to get so much emotion into so few lines.
I give this film a score of 7 as I quite enjoyed it despite it's flaws. Don't watch this movie if you have to do a school project on Romeo and Juliet, though!
- stanley_biggs
- 1 mar 2014
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Romeo & Juliet?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 1.162.635 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 520.116 USD
- 13 ott 2013
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 2.966.268 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 58 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti