VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,8/10
7191
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA detective works to solve a case involving a young deaf boy and a web site that's run out of a home that once belonged to a serial killer.A detective works to solve a case involving a young deaf boy and a web site that's run out of a home that once belonged to a serial killer.A detective works to solve a case involving a young deaf boy and a web site that's run out of a home that once belonged to a serial killer.
Myquan Jackson
- Tucker
- (as Lewis Jackson)
Machete Bang Bang
- Tracy
- (as Elizabeth Brissenden)
Francisco A. Pino
- Darryl
- (as Francisco Pino)
David Yuzuk
- Police Officer 1
- (as David Danello)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- BlooperNear the very beginning of the film, there are several shots of newspaper stories under headlines about the murders. Only a very few sentences of the text of the stories is actually in English and relevant. The rest is dummy text.
Recensione in evidenza
Despite having some pretty good ideas behind it, this movie was terrible.
Good:
Bad:
Good:
- The setting was interesting. A bunch of cam-girls who live in the house of a serial killer and people can pay to (watch them) act out serial killer-y fantasies. That's pretty unique and adequately creepy. You get to see some gore-y shots of dead girls and related. It had all the elements of a good horror movie...they just were totally misused.
- A few good actors. Terrance Howard and the serial killer dude had good chemistry. The deaf guy and the main girl were fine. Queen Latifah's cameo was well done. She should've played a bigger role though, would've been funny to see her as a main character in a slasher.
- It was shot well enough. Sets were good.
Bad:
- Everything else. The storyline was written in such a disjointed way that it made no sense. It jumped around and was needlessly difficult to follow. You have the main storyline of a guy in the house murdering women which was super generic but decent. Then you have this other storyline with Terrance Howard which had almost NOTHING to do with the main storyline and was used in a way that rendered it completely pointless (way to waste your best actors). From the preview I expected this to be more like Silence of the Lambs, but it wasn't at all. The concept of a dude watching these girls die via webcam was OK, but not executed in an interesting or substantive way. It wouldn't have changed much if that part wasn't even in the movie (sadly, the same goes for Howard). And just when things start getting interesting, the movie prematurely ends with no resolution whatsoever. It felt like the director didn't quite know what type of movie they wanted to make and used elements of several (silence of the lambs, feardotcom, untraceable, etc), but was unable to connect and interweave them.
- Maybe it was just the version I saw, but the sound was abysmal. The music was WAY too loud and all of Howard / killer's dialog was nearly incomprehensible.
- There are also some stupid plot holes like how the kid magically "hacked" and got the power to turn back on in the house / website.
- wormsoftheerth
- 13 lug 2014
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is House of Bodies?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 2.800.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 19 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was House of Bodies (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi