John

"John" is an unforgettable punch of raw, necessary cinema. It's a window into the challenging, complex lives of LGBTQ+ sex workers navigating the shadows of the Hollywood machine.

The influences of Italian Neorealism and the French New Wave aren't just for show; they give the film a vibrant, authentic energy. The handheld camerawork and unvarnished locations make you feel like you are truly walking the streets alongside John. Every frame feels deliberate, every long take forces you to confront the humanity and dignity of characters often ignored by mainstream media.

There's not much here. The story centers around the male hustling trade in LaLa land. What might have been an excellent docudrama exploring the under represented lives of young men on the street completely misses the mark. First of all, the venue is all wrong. The producers and writers might have chosen a smaller town to focus their attention. Nobody cares about LA, it's way too stereotypical. Secondly, the writing is terrible. Then there's the acting which sinks this cinematic ship even further. John, around whom the picture revolves, has no personality whatsoever. We really don't learn too much about what motivated him to end up on the streets in the first place. He doesn't come across at all as a sympathetic character., the others even less so. This viewer wishes that the script had more socially relevant dialogue about the ups and downs of the life of a male sex worker. I also feel strongly that LA was the wrong selection for this yawn filled nonsense. Don't waste your time.

John Review "John," the brainchild of writer-director Han Minh Le, is poised to make its festival debut this year. Backed by producer Joseph Hieu, known for the Sundance Film Festival's award-winning "The Accidental Getaway Driver", the film dives deep into the tumultuous life of a young Latino sex worker.

The film's 90-minute run lays bare every aspect of John's struggle; from the poor neighborhood he lives in to the condoms and medicine he has to steal to keep his lifestyle afloat, at times getting too close for comfort. But that's a part of Le Han's directorial vision, who's devoted to giving his audience a one-of-a-kind experience, that's both raw and authentic.

Nonetheless, there's hope to be had in the fact that even someone like John, who isn't as resourceful, has people looking out for him. Peaches, a black trans prostitute who is by far the most interesting character in the film looks out for him on the regular, offering him companionship and financial help. Celine Jackson, the actor who plays the character knocks it out of the park with her performance and comes off as a seasoned veteran. There's also Miguel, an older experienced hustler who guides John through the dynamics of their profession. Though not as impactful as his counterpart, Seth Hafley does an adequate job.

Not only does the film explore in detail what's life like for sex workers, as it constantly portrays the threats of addiction, homelessness, and HIV but it also touches upon the stigma of being queer in a society that's becoming increasingly intolerant. Sebastian Perez does a great job of portraying the isolation and loneliness of his character and the film's cinematography and camerawork only make it more powerful.

The film's standout aspect is the director's surprising choice to shoot it via an iPhone. Not only is the quality uncompromised but Han Le takes full advantage of the medium, resulting in shots that would be very difficult to pull off with an elaborate camera setup. Ultimately, the decision lends greatly to the director's vision of delivering a very personal look into the lives of the film's characters.

All in all, "John" is a powerful and thought-provoking film that leaves an indelible mark by delving into uncomfortable realities.

John" (2023) is a thought-provoking action film that takes a unique approach to storytelling. Set against the backdrop of Hollywood, LA, it delves into the struggles of LGBTQ sex workers, drawing inspiration from Italian neorealism and the French New Wave. The movie artfully blends action sequences with a poignant narrative, creating a compelling and emotional experience for viewers.

The film's exploration of the lives of sex workers within the LGBTQ community is both sensitive and raw, shedding light on a seldom-told side of society. The characters are richly developed, and the cast's performances are remarkable, bringing depth and authenticity to their roles.

Masterfully combines elements of classic cinema with a modern sensibility, resulting in a visually striking movie. The cinematography captures the essence of LA's gritty streets and vibrant nightlife, providing a vivid and immersive backdrop for the story.

The action sequences in "John" are thrilling and well-executed, showcasing impressive choreography and intense moments. These sequences serve not only as entertainment but also as a metaphorical expression of the characters' struggles and determination.

While the film's artistic influences are apparent, "John" manages to create a distinct identity of its own, offering a fresh take on LGBTQ issues and social realities. It invites viewers to reflect on the challenges faced by marginalized communities while delivering a gripping cinematic experience.

In conclusion, "John" (2023) is an action movie that goes beyond the genre's conventions, using its unique storytelling style to shed light on important societal issues. It's a must-see for those who appreciate thought-provoking cinema with a mix of action and social commentary.

I can see what they were trying to do with this film, it just did not work.

I can appreciate the attempts to touch upon French new wave but it really does miss the mark.

This is a well worn and weary tale of street prostitution, attempting to blend realism with drama.

But the script is so disjointed and overlong. Whilst it tries to touch upon the different stories of various characters, be they prostitutes or their renters, it rests on cliche and feels too forced.

Whilst I can appreciate the rough edges of the acting (and their are some lovely performances) you need a strong lead, which this film fails at delivering. The lead actor is a one trick pony, utterly failing to portray any complexity or depth to a role which requires it.

It also suffers from some confusion on its style in acting. On the one hand it wants to portray realistic and raw, but then throws in some completely contrived sections.

I understand there are people who will love this, maybe I just think we have moved on from this style - relevant more for a different time in film.

But it is not a total loss for me, hence the 4 stars. Whilst meandering and dull at points, it has some bright moments which makes it worth a watch.