VALUTAZIONE IMDb
3,7/10
2411
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaAfter gaining the power of invisibility; a man becomes a vigilante, in order to take revenge on those who have wronged him.After gaining the power of invisibility; a man becomes a vigilante, in order to take revenge on those who have wronged him.After gaining the power of invisibility; a man becomes a vigilante, in order to take revenge on those who have wronged him.
Shruti Panwar
- Madhuri
- (as Shruti Ulfat)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizRemake of Ashok Kuamr's film Mr x 1957 directed by Nanabhai Bhatt, father of Mahesh Bhatt.
- BlooperAt the end when Amyra Dastur was taking a bath, and Emraan Hashmi came, and she looked at him, the camera moved, the Towel that she was wearing was seen at the corner, and no one will take a shower wearing a towel around his/her chest.
- Versioni alternativeThe UK release was cut, the distributor chose to reduce scenes of strong violence and horror in order to obtain a 12A classification. An uncut 15 classification was available.
- ConnessioniReferenced in C.I.D.: Jaanbaaz Mr. X (2015)
Recensione in evidenza
I stopped watching Bollywood movies but after watching 'Badlapur', I thought they aren't that bad and so went to watch Mr. X because of its interesting plot which made me realize why I stopped watching Bollywood movies (again).
The film starts abruptly giving a crash course for the character's life, whole character development in first 15 min with the song, after that the characters are dropped and the actors are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.
The movie insults the intellect of the audience by offering bullshit logical explanation to how the protagonist gains his powers and what exactly is his power set. Somehow, a chemical that he ingests not only makes him invisible but also his clothes!! He becomes visible irrespective of the light source's direction. It is more than apparent that they have bent the logic to their convenience like giving the power of invisibility to a piece of clothing which had nothing to do with the chemical ingested or the chemical at the warehouse, just to keep the character clothed whenever he decides to make an appearance.
The heroine is given a complicated and borderline artificial personality, also a not so subtle attempt to portray her as an antagonist which FAILS and instead comes out really foolish.
The only thing that made this movie different was the new antagonist, he really had a presence but fellow actors sabotaged his talent and made him look like a fool too. Anyways the reason I rate this 4 instead of 2 is because of the antagonist.
I know getting an original idea is tough but doesn't mean that the producers (and/or directors) get to pick out a movie out of the shelf and remake it into a monstrosity.
To the directors: Please invest some time and find a set of eyes with a brain to tag along with you when you waste money making movies which kill your reputation and the viewer's time.
Moral of the story for the viewers: Check (and believe) the IMDb score before you decide to go to a movie!
The film starts abruptly giving a crash course for the character's life, whole character development in first 15 min with the song, after that the characters are dropped and the actors are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.
The movie insults the intellect of the audience by offering bullshit logical explanation to how the protagonist gains his powers and what exactly is his power set. Somehow, a chemical that he ingests not only makes him invisible but also his clothes!! He becomes visible irrespective of the light source's direction. It is more than apparent that they have bent the logic to their convenience like giving the power of invisibility to a piece of clothing which had nothing to do with the chemical ingested or the chemical at the warehouse, just to keep the character clothed whenever he decides to make an appearance.
The heroine is given a complicated and borderline artificial personality, also a not so subtle attempt to portray her as an antagonist which FAILS and instead comes out really foolish.
The only thing that made this movie different was the new antagonist, he really had a presence but fellow actors sabotaged his talent and made him look like a fool too. Anyways the reason I rate this 4 instead of 2 is because of the antagonist.
I know getting an original idea is tough but doesn't mean that the producers (and/or directors) get to pick out a movie out of the shelf and remake it into a monstrosity.
To the directors: Please invest some time and find a set of eyes with a brain to tag along with you when you waste money making movies which kill your reputation and the viewer's time.
Moral of the story for the viewers: Check (and believe) the IMDb score before you decide to go to a movie!
- m-siddharth93-746-157778
- 20 apr 2015
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Mr. X?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 44.995 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 30.097 USD
- 19 apr 2015
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 5.061.387 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione2 ore 13 minuti
- Colore
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti