Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaAn adaptation of Madame Bovary transported to Rye, New York in the 1930's. All characters have been renamed.An adaptation of Madame Bovary transported to Rye, New York in the 1930's. All characters have been renamed.An adaptation of Madame Bovary transported to Rye, New York in the 1930's. All characters have been renamed.
Fotos
Lyle Talbot
- Dr. Jerome Preston 'Jerry' Gregory
- (as Lysle Talbot)
Wilson Benge
- Joseph - Jerry's Butler
- (não creditado)
Al Bridge
- Police Sergeant
- (não creditado)
Miki Morita
- Tam - Stockmar's Valet
- (não creditado)
William H. O'Brien
- Country Club Waiter
- (não creditado)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesFirst film of Lyle Talbot who his role's character is of a "Doctor" and he played the same role (doctor) in several films and in most of them as a leading actor.
- Citações
Dr. Daniel Gregory: You're talking quite a lot, Jane, Darling.
- ConexõesVersion of Madame Bovary (1934)
Avaliação em destaque
I loved how the opening credits for "Unholy Love" said 'suggested by MADAME BOVARY'. That's an old fashioned way of saying the stories have similarities but that the screenplay takes HUGE liberties--which is pretty funny since BOVARY is considered a classic.
The film is very much like dbborroughs says in their review. While watchable, the film is too mannered and dull--making it very tough going. However, I might even go further and say that some of the acting is downright terrible. While H.B. Warner is a fine actor, many of the others in the cast weren't so fine. Heck, a few stumbled over their lines and the film SHOULD have had these scenes re-shot. That they weren't and that the overall effort was so dull is an indication that either the director wasn't especially competent or the film was as cheap-o production and the low budget wouldn't all re-shots---or perhaps both. Not enjoyable and not worth the bother.
The film is very much like dbborroughs says in their review. While watchable, the film is too mannered and dull--making it very tough going. However, I might even go further and say that some of the acting is downright terrible. While H.B. Warner is a fine actor, many of the others in the cast weren't so fine. Heck, a few stumbled over their lines and the film SHOULD have had these scenes re-shot. That they weren't and that the overall effort was so dull is an indication that either the director wasn't especially competent or the film was as cheap-o production and the low budget wouldn't all re-shots---or perhaps both. Not enjoyable and not worth the bother.
- planktonrules
- 10 de fev. de 2014
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 15 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.37 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Unholy Love (1932) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda