AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,7/10
18 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Com um estrangulador em série à solta, um contador vagueia pela cidade em busca do grupo de vigilantes com a intenção de capturar o assassino.Com um estrangulador em série à solta, um contador vagueia pela cidade em busca do grupo de vigilantes com a intenção de capturar o assassino.Com um estrangulador em série à solta, um contador vagueia pela cidade em busca do grupo de vigilantes com a intenção de capturar o assassino.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 2 indicações no total
Daniel von Bargen
- Vigilante
- (as Daniel Von Bargen)
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe film is an homage and tribute to German Expressionist cinema, particularly the works of German filmmakers F.W. Murnau, Georg Wilhelm Pabst and Fritz Lang.
- Trilhas sonorasThe Cannon Song from Little Threepenny Music
By Kurt Weill
Performed by Canadian Chamber Ensemble
Conducted by Raffi Armenian
Courtesy of CBC Records - Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
Avaliação em destaque
Another mid-career Allen film unfairly dismissed both by critics and (I must admit) myself at the time of it's release. Sometimes with great filmmakers, we get spoiled and anything flawed or less than pure genius gets maligned for being weaker than that filmmaker's very best work instead of being appreciated for being miles ahead of most of the films that get made.
I was shocked at how much better I liked this on a recent re-viewing almost 20 years after seeing it in the theater. Yes, the super-star cameos still seem a bit distracting and self-serving, but nowhere near as much as in 1992. Yes, some plot elements work better than others, the ending is kind of clunky, etc. But this is still a great-looking, visually dense film, that manages to tread (most of the time) a very difficult tightrope of being funny and playful, while still exploring disturbing themes of paranoia, guilt, crowd mentality, religion, etc. Certainly not a great film, but a brave one more worthy of being enjoyed for it's strengths than attacked for its admitted shortcomings.
I was shocked at how much better I liked this on a recent re-viewing almost 20 years after seeing it in the theater. Yes, the super-star cameos still seem a bit distracting and self-serving, but nowhere near as much as in 1992. Yes, some plot elements work better than others, the ending is kind of clunky, etc. But this is still a great-looking, visually dense film, that manages to tread (most of the time) a very difficult tightrope of being funny and playful, while still exploring disturbing themes of paranoia, guilt, crowd mentality, religion, etc. Certainly not a great film, but a brave one more worthy of being enjoyed for it's strengths than attacked for its admitted shortcomings.
- runamokprods
- 2 de jul. de 2010
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Shadows and Fog?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Shadows and Fog
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 14.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 2.735.731
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 1.111.314
- 22 de mar. de 1992
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 2.735.731
- Tempo de duração1 hora 25 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Neblina e Sombras (1991) officially released in India in English?
Responda