AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,0/10
12 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um amnésico se descobre saltando no tempo entre 2000 e 2002, quando seu passado retorna a ele.Um amnésico se descobre saltando no tempo entre 2000 e 2002, quando seu passado retorna a ele.Um amnésico se descobre saltando no tempo entre 2000 e 2002, quando seu passado retorna a ele.
Ryan Phillippe
- Simon Cable
- (as Ryan Phillipe)
Magdalena Manville
- Female Resident
- (as Magdelena Manville)
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesChristian Slater (as Peter), Stephen Dorff (as Simon Cable), and Jennifer Love Hewitt (as Anna Cable) were originally set to star.
- Erros de gravaçãoDr. Newman refers to Simon's two-year amnesiac memory gap as "short-term memory loss". Short-term memory is measured in seconds, not years.
- Citações
[first lines]
Doctor Newman: Easy. Diazepam, 5 milligrams. Easy now, Mr. Cable. You're going to be fine. You're just having a nightmare.
- ConexõesReferences A Máquina do Tempo (1960)
Avaliação em destaque
I've never liked the idea of test screenings. The changes they make just end up neutering a movie and making it "safe" for the general masses. But if ever a movie needed feedback to prompt a rewrite and alternate ending, this is it.
The first half of this movie is spectacular. It's atmospheric, tense, and confusing (in a good way). It kept you guessing the whole way. Much like Memento, it's an intelligent film that makes you watch closely and think. The story could have gone a number of directions.
...but the last half, it all falls apart. They start changing the "rules", the suspense gives way to straight storytelling, and the ending goes a completely different direction than it could have, and SHOULD have. It's not just that I didn't like the ending or that it didn't match my predictions. The problem is the truth is still unclear and viewers are left confused. Too much is left unexplained.
As it is, the film is wasted potential. A good story and a good movie, but one that could have been so much better with a different ending.
The first half of this movie is spectacular. It's atmospheric, tense, and confusing (in a good way). It kept you guessing the whole way. Much like Memento, it's an intelligent film that makes you watch closely and think. The story could have gone a number of directions.
...but the last half, it all falls apart. They start changing the "rules", the suspense gives way to straight storytelling, and the ending goes a completely different direction than it could have, and SHOULD have. It's not just that I didn't like the ending or that it didn't match my predictions. The problem is the truth is still unclear and viewers are left confused. Too much is left unexplained.
As it is, the film is wasted potential. A good story and a good movie, but one that could have been so much better with a different ending.
- shiftyeyeddog
- 13 de jul. de 2008
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The I Inside?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 8.800.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 72.962
- Tempo de duração1 hora 30 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was O Terceiro Olho (2004) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda