Rookie Bookie

Name: Rookie Bookie
Genre: Drama
Released: 2005-02-18
Duration: 1 h 47 min
Rating: 5.7
Cast: J.W. Williams, Ralph Hatley, Dedrick Bullard

2005
1 h 47 min

AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb

5,7/10

SUA AVALIAÇÃO

Drama

Adicionar um enredo no seu idioma"Rookie Bookie" is a story of greed combined with opportunity. Joe Turner is a struggling pharmaceutical sales rep that finds himself mixed up with a group of doctors involved in a high stak... Ler tudo"Rookie Bookie" is a story of greed combined with opportunity. Joe Turner is a struggling pharmaceutical sales rep that finds himself mixed up with a group of doctors involved in a high stakes gambling ring headed up by a corrupt hospital administrator. Before he can think twice,... Ler tudo"Rookie Bookie" is a story of greed combined with opportunity. Joe Turner is a struggling pharmaceutical sales rep that finds himself mixed up with a group of doctors involved in a high stakes gambling ring headed up by a corrupt hospital administrator. Before he can think twice, Joe becomes a bookie and gets in way over his head. As he desperately tries to get out of... Ler tudo

Direção
- Kris Boyatt
- Natalie Boyatt
Roteiristas
- Kris Boyatt
- Natalie Boyatt
Artistas

Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro

AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb

5,7/10

SUA AVALIAÇÃO

Direção
- Kris Boyatt
- Natalie Boyatt
Roteiristas
- Kris Boyatt
- Natalie Boyatt
Artistas

1Avaliação de usuário

Veja as informações de produção no IMDbPro

Fotos

Enredo

Editar

Avaliações de usuários1

Avaliar

Avaliação em destaque

4/10

Good acting, Bad directing

OK, I just borrowed this movie. The acting was fairly good considering it was an indie. Hadley(good emotion), Williams(despite a Tom Cruise look, did a good job transitioning from one part of the film to the other) and Bullard(natural talent) did a great job. Didn't like the ending, saw it coming. Besides the obvious holes in the story, I think it flowed well. Technically I thought it was boring, the camera didn't follow the actors (in some scenes they dipped out of frame for too long), there were no rolling shots (it was to confined, like the director didn't know how to make the camera move), lips didn't match ADR, the lighting was horrible, makes me wonder what film school these people went to? I gave it a 4 because of the acting, it's what held the film together. The actors deserved a better effort from the director.