Fotos
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Enredo
Avaliação em destaque
It is known around the world Mexican Productions are a struggle, the tiny budgets always imposing on quality and resources hindering Directors and Artists alike, it makes film-making a kind of rite-of-passage instead of a creation process, which turns out into a painful quality versus budget outcomes.
It is not the case of this film tho, The Director and his personal crew (below the execs), perform remarkably well pulling focus on high quality craftsmanship in every department even when the executive production falls back onto a cinema school which is famous for skimming off the top on student awarded budgets for internal benefit (and I'm not talking the students'), apparently, Amir Galvan's vision of traditional storytelling has nothing traditional about it (as shown in "Lo que quedó de Pancho", so far his most renowned work), he manages to immerse the audience in a well told story made out of tiny bit memories and facts the characters weave around them, now, this is usual for feature long films, take into account tho, that this type of parallel flashback-forward storytelling in an under 30 min piece is quite difficult.
The art is simple but right on, Photography is as classic as it can get with a Mexican imprinted artistry rounded with good craftsmanship, I've been told that it contains digital work (on the lines of CG and replacements) and this surprised me as it is very well integrated, The acting goes beyond the characters for a couple of moments but I take it it was just a miscast on some choices (probably constrained by the budget).
It seems Mexico could do with a new lab that provides affordable yet good processing as "Churubusco Azteca" has long fallen from grace.
It is not the case of this film tho, The Director and his personal crew (below the execs), perform remarkably well pulling focus on high quality craftsmanship in every department even when the executive production falls back onto a cinema school which is famous for skimming off the top on student awarded budgets for internal benefit (and I'm not talking the students'), apparently, Amir Galvan's vision of traditional storytelling has nothing traditional about it (as shown in "Lo que quedó de Pancho", so far his most renowned work), he manages to immerse the audience in a well told story made out of tiny bit memories and facts the characters weave around them, now, this is usual for feature long films, take into account tho, that this type of parallel flashback-forward storytelling in an under 30 min piece is quite difficult.
The art is simple but right on, Photography is as classic as it can get with a Mexican imprinted artistry rounded with good craftsmanship, I've been told that it contains digital work (on the lines of CG and replacements) and this surprised me as it is very well integrated, The acting goes beyond the characters for a couple of moments but I take it it was just a miscast on some choices (probably constrained by the budget).
It seems Mexico could do with a new lab that provides affordable yet good processing as "Churubusco Azteca" has long fallen from grace.
- zinzalabim
- 14 de ago. de 2006
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 75.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração23 minutos
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente