The College Admissions Scandal

The movie does a good job of pretending it does a good job, which ironically is the subject matter of what these parents and their kids do. This is a Lifetime movie. You really think they're going to tell the full story to the point where it's good enough to deserve a high movie rating? There's a lot glazed over and omitted and purposely misconstrued. But they have to profit off of the sensational story and make a lil movie.

They are making it seem as if the parents, students, and Rick Singer are the ONLY ones at fault, and those participating members of the universities involved are seen as a select, rare handful of ne'er do wells. When the truth is, the whole thing is a scam. What these parents, students and co-conspirators in the admissions departments etc did differently in this situation, (rather than an admissions corruption being unique from all the other parents whose kids are in top universities), is get caught. It's still happening, with other Rick Singers. There are nepotist, cultist systems at play and full force when it comes to university acceptance. Lori Loughlin is smoke and mirrors. Do not get distracted and do not use her as a shield either, do not throw stones in a glass house at her though she is wrong, too.

If your grades aren't there, certain people know their kids need to get sports scholarships, so they get their kids into extracurricular activities young. Even if they're not star students. It has nothing to do with being a "minority" as this movie keeps grossly saying. Minorities know better than anyone that in order to get into a top college let alone any college, you have to have good grades to stay on the school sports team and then from there you can get an athletic scholarship or just impress an admissions dept. It's these other people who feel the need to scandalize their kids into success and it's weird to me because 1. You can take the SAT's any time at any age since education is your right and trying again is too, and 2. You're "rich and powerful and famous/know someone famous" so why do you feel the need to do this? Just walk in the school and say "do you know who I am?" But of course the universities can't be so blatant about the fact that they do in fact limitlessly accept these "do you know who I am?" people all the time, so they pretend they have a rigorous qualifications process. Now your kid is studying and training to the point of ill health, while mediocre Scott and Ashley related to this celebrity or that celebrity or who have this "legacy" alumni parent just finesse their way into college. Heck, some don't even have qualifications and they just suddenly have high earning jobs. I check successful people's LinkedIn profiles and there are many who don't have a great university/educational background, and suddenly they have a top executive or vice president of xyz role. Check the LinkedIn of your own manager for starters. Mhm. Smells like nepotism/cultism/favoritism etc to me. But then you get model minorities who have this extensive educational background and a million licenses and they just have a regular job. You got a Master's to manage a little iHop franchisee or to be HR at a little clothing store or the check-in desk at a dentist? I don't think so. But Scott and Ashley with nothing or just a regular Bachelor's at a rinky dink college but maybe went to a great preparatory high school academy manage a hedge fund or are vice prez at a huge corp. So the point is...we're playing their game.

These celebrities aren't stupid enough to get caught up like this. Something's always in it for them no matter how you or I may think they are stupid. Wool is always pulled over our eyes. Now, yes, many celebrities are much dumber than everyday civilians who are successful. In fact, everyday civilians who are successful make celebrities what they are in the first place; they manage them, train them, interview them, invest in them, blog about them, dress them, schedule them, nurse them, drive them around, and hospitality them. These everyday smarter rich people have celebrity clientele. And celebrities need conservatorships because their lifestyle and financial stupidity shows everyday. Thus you get Rick Singers, Epsteins and Madoffs profiting off of this rich stupidity. And this rich stupidity is used institutionally and no one says anything because these rich stupid celebrity's kids are attending school with each other and the kids of these smart rich everyday people who work with these celebs. Now these kids grow up privy to what their parents do, and what their parents do for THEM. Now there's a cult/culture of nepotizing your kids into this opportunity, this university, this apartment/studio/home. And guess who's stupidly competing with these nepotist cultists? You and me. Well I'm not going too, but clearly you people still are. Because people are still busting their butt trying to get into certain universities when, no matter what you probably do, you will not get accepted to these elite universities and even if you do get accepted, why the freak would you want to?! Unless of course you finessed your way in. There's ALWAYS a finesse, I'm not buying it that this is the only scandal.

A standard finesse is to get your kid into a sport or music training at school. You knock on their door at night to remind them what's at stake without saying what's at stake. This movie shows the parent sermonizing to their kids what's at stake, and some parents out there do boot camp their kids to do well at school. Now the universities want to scapegoat these rich stupid celebrities, when everyone involved including the celebs are equally nefarious, arriviste and unscrupulous and corrupt and downright nasty. And this movie seems to want to just make it seem like the parents put the universities in a bad position, as if the universities were fooled or lied to or deceived. As if their other students have not done this or some other kind of corruption or ruthless finesse. No. These schools know their lights stay on due to rich stupidity of celebs and the cleverness of the smarter everyday rich people. These schools know if the applicant isn't rich, that they know how to finesse otherwise via a sport scholarship and the rare type, excellent grades. It's the morons who try to get in with genuine grades excellence though. You're not getting picked on for being smart due to jealousy. It's because you're doing something unnecessary, and people are snickering behind their hands at you. Of course it depends on the scholarship but the catch 22 is that if everyone figures out one way to win at a competition (this case, the competition is university acceptance) then that way is now nullified since it becomes a saturated pool. So now you need to one-up that pool and arch over that competition, right?

Why do you think there is so much racism? If the black or asian kid excels at a school full of white people, or if black neighborhoods have highly performing local schools, either way white people's opportunities are compromised. The finessing starts from day one in kindergarten the area where you want to raise your kid from scratch, not on the day that Felicity Huffman a rich stupid celebrity agreed to work with a guy who's long acquired insane riches from doing the very same thing 100s of times, no matter what the news does to sensationalize it as a rare celebrity scandal. I'm not stupid. There's been a number of finesses to solidify your stupid kid's future. Most people just aren't stupid about it. They put it all off on their kids. That's why I don't understand the people who stereotype black kids as being good at basketball and football and track or hispanics being good at soccer and baseball. Those are top sports that white and asian kids do all the time too lol. And this is a form of finessing your way into university. If you have literally figured out a way to win in a competition, it's a scandal already. Lori Loughlin and Felicity Huffman were either just stupid (they are celebrities, who are stupid; most celebs did not even finish middle school LOL) or they are still stupid, but they must have known they were going to get exposed. However like I said it's all smoke and mirrors. There are 1000s and 1000s of Stanford, Yale, Dartmouth, NYU, etc alumni/current students/legacy applicants who know that they "figured out a way." Just play this sport in high school and you'll be fine. Model minorities don't feel confident doing just that, so they like to excel academically too. But for the most part, it's not needed. Scandalize your SAT/ACT store, use your parents being alumni/rich/celebrities, and play this sport. The "losers" in life (you and me) didn't know this and thought we actually had to get great grades. I have to laugh.

You think Stanford etc are good schools because their acceptance rate is low? It's a pyramid scheme profiting off the self worth of these children and their deranged old-school parents who traditionalize getting a degree as the best thing ever. Their acceptance rate isn't low because the required SAT scores are so high. SAT's are a joke anyway. SAT's are a front criterion. Their acceptance rate is low because only a oligarchy of the nation and world's population not only has the money to buy their way into the school but also has the knowledge to do it. Where else do the schools get their money? The sky? And now why would you carry on that sick culture of corruption by pressuring your non-rich or nonwhite child to get into a school? LOL. Stop it. Many great non elite universities will take no SAT at all, or a 900-1200. Stanford ridiculously asks for a 1400+. Now that's not unattainable. It's all rote and some studying and some cheating (don't lie). Everyone has the opportunity to highly score on the SAT, great news right? I'm sure many people with that SAT score still don't get in, though, too right? Screw college. Get a License/Certification and a job and get over it.