Um cientista brilhante, mas egocêntrico, dá vida a uma criatura em um experimento monstruoso que acaba levando à destruição do criador e de sua trágica criação.Um cientista brilhante, mas egocêntrico, dá vida a uma criatura em um experimento monstruoso que acaba levando à destruição do criador e de sua trágica criação.Um cientista brilhante, mas egocêntrico, dá vida a uma criatura em um experimento monstruoso que acaba levando à destruição do criador e de sua trágica criação.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Estrelas
- Prêmios
- 5 vitórias e 18 indicações no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
Finally...
The visuals are phenomenal, the acting is outstanding all around (although Isaac and Elordi are the standouts), Guillermo's writing and direction are steadfast and intimately visceral, the music is haunting, and the cinematography is some of the best of the year. I will be seeing this again in theaters, but I hope Netflix sits down and let's this epic go to IMAX. That would be one hell of an experience.
Biggest disappointment of 2025
I've loved Guillermo Del Toro since I was a teenager and I watched Pan's Labyrinth for the first time, and then I made it my goal to see everything he's ever directed. But I've loved Mary Shelley's Frankenstein since I was in elementary school. After I read it the first time, I kept rereading it over and over again.
My issue with this is that this is not Frankenstein. At least, not Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. The story is completely changed, and I'm not sure that it is for the better. I was seeing all these reviewers rage how this is the Frankenstein we deserve and that this is as close as it gets to the actual book. The former is up for debate, but the latter is a straight up lie from someone who's obviously never read or understood the source material.
If this would've been an original story, I would've liked it way more. But seeing as it is supposed to be an adaptation of a childhood favorite of mine, it simply doesn't hold up. Definitely the biggest disappointment of the year for me, and I've been looking forward to this since last year. I was disappointed when I heard that it wasn't playing in theaters near me, but I guess it was for the best.
If you're going to watch this, I would suggest you drop all expectations of it being Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and watch it as it's own original thing.
Del Toro's Melancholically Radiant Vision for Shelley's Classic
Visually, the film is nothing short of a masterpiece. The set design, costumes, and cinematography are stunning, and every frame is a joy to look at. The visual effects (admirably, mostly practical effects) are spot on, and Desplat's score, albeit a little bit overly dramatic at times, is hauntingly beautiful and elevates the experience to a whole other level.
I will admit this is the first film adaptation of Mary Shelley's classic tale that I watched, but I am familiar with some of the artistic liberties Del Toro took in his adaptation, and I think the vast majority of them are beautiful and help breathe life into the tale at modern times, while also helping differentiate it from other adaptations and giving Del Toro's unique spin to it. Similarly to his work on Pinocchio (2022), you can see his admiration and respect for the source material while you can also see his personal footprint and soul poured all over the project.
Oscar Isaac is brilliant in his role as Dr. Frankenstein, and Jacob Elordi shines in a career-pivoting role. Goth and Waltz are great as well, and the film features some other pleasantly familiar faces, like Game of Thrones alums Charles Dance and David Bradley. An all-around great performance from the amazing cast completes the craft of the film as another career highlight in Del Toro's magical filmography.
I will say the movie is a little bit too long while ironically the plot also takes some shortcuts and contrivances to push things forward; but that's not as dire as it sounds, and the film is enjoyable from start to finish, with great writing and directing from Del Toro.
A poetic tale that mourns and dazzles, Del Toro's adaptation of "Frankenstein" is one of the most beautiful and well-crafted films of the year. While preserving the heart of the original tale and taking brave liberties to unify it as Guillermo's personal work, Frankenstein works on every level and manages to serve as 150 minutes of pure cinema and breathtaking entertainment.
Very close
Del Toro finally gets his hands on Frankenstein
Now compared to some other reviewer's my score may seem pretty low, and let me start by saying it's going to be loved by critics and loved by award shows, and deserves the accolades it will receive, but for me personally, I respect it more than I love it.
Del Toro is a incredible director, and that's more than evident in this picture, I enjoyed the story, and his rendition of it, visually it's stunning. But, sorry to say, I'm just not a huge fan of Gothic horror, I never have been. I've tried over the years, and this movie I surprisingly enjoyed more than most, but it's something that's just not always going to be my cup of tea.
There were large portions of the movie I enjoyed, there did come a part in the movie where it headlined the title 'Part 2' which I dreaded, not because I wasn't enjoying it, but I had already felt like I watched a feature movie, yet I was only half way. It was a bit long for me. Which only felt longer because of the pacing.
On the positives, it looks great visually, set pieces are gothic but brilliant, and I loved the cast performances, especially Jacob Elordi as the The Creature. I was not familiar with this actor, but I give credit where it's due, that was a brilliant performance.
Look. If gothic horror is not your thing, still give it a chance, it can be long winded but it's a great rendition of a classic story, I'd be surprised if you hated it even if it's not your favorite genre. If you rated it higher, I'm not going to argue with you, it probably deserves it.
New and Upcoming Book-to-Screen Adaptations
New and Upcoming Book-to-Screen Adaptations
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesVictor Frankenstein's laboratory and Captain Anderson's ship were fully constructed sets. "I want real sets", director Guillermo del Toro explains. "I don't want digital, I don't want AI, I don't want simulation. I want old-fashioned craftsmanship: people painting, building, hammering, plastering."
- Erros de gravaçãoIn 1857, Victor Frankenstein buys dynamite to blow up the Creature. Alfred Nobel did not invent dynamite until 1866, 9 years after the movie was set.
- Citações
The Creature: An idea, a feeling became clear to me. The hunter did not hate the wolf. The wolf did not hate the sheep. But violence felt inevitable between them. Perhaps, I thought, this was the way of the world. It would hunt you and kill you just for being who you are.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe Netflix logo is formed by two batteries running an electric charge in Victor Frankenstein's laboratory.
- ConexõesFeatured in Horror's Greatest: Film Scores (2025)
- Trilhas sonorasRondeau (Abedelazer)
Written by Henry Purcell
Arranged by Jonathan Scott
Performed by Jonathan Scott
courtesy of: Scott Brothers Duo
Principais escolhas
November 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
November 2025 TV and Streaming Premiere Dates
- How long is Frankenstein?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Dr. Frankenstein
- Locações de filme
- North Bay, Nipissing, Ontário, Canadá(Location / exteriors - Arctic)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 120.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 144.496
- Tempo de duração
- 2 h 29 min(149 min)
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1






