Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaThe citizens of a small town face a nightmare of apocalyptic proportions after a government plane crashes nearby, unleashing a top-secret government experiment that can't be contained.The citizens of a small town face a nightmare of apocalyptic proportions after a government plane crashes nearby, unleashing a top-secret government experiment that can't be contained.The citizens of a small town face a nightmare of apocalyptic proportions after a government plane crashes nearby, unleashing a top-secret government experiment that can't be contained.
Fotos
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesIncredibly Gruner doesn't utter a single word in this entire flick.
Avaliação em destaque
...you shouldn't write a review of 'Re-Generator.' I hate coming onto IMDb and not having much to say about a movie other than "it's awful," but this movie is just that ~ awful. There isn't much else one can say.
I don't want to spend the entire review repeating myself or coming up with as many variations of the word "terrible" I can, so I'll just go over the main points:
1. This is not a movie... It is several movies thrown in a blender and tossed on DVD with little care. I can't help but notice the two directors credited. One is Olivier Gruner, the writer, producer and star. And then there's some other guy. It really looks like the movie was abandoned at one point by the original director (Gruner?) and then the other guy came along and tried to salvage what he could of the original material, adding in scenes with Paul Logan, unending stock footage, etc. After seeing Gruner's second directorial effort ('Sector 4 Extraction'... do yourself a favor and skip it), I can't say anything positive about his directorial skills. (What's up with making all the actors speak directly into the camera??) My guess is the movie had so many issues with him in the director's chair, that someone else had to step in and re-shoot half the movie to "salvage" it.
2. Nothing happens in the movie. There is nothing at stake for any of the characters at any point. Everyone is just moping around, babbling, waiting to be picked off by The Beast, Gruner's silent killer (who, for the record, performs ZERO action in the movie!). Nothing is interesting in the 90-minute run-time! Characters are introduced, then never heard from again. Plot points are brought up, then ignored. Nothing adds up. It truly feels like half the movie was simply shot as 'damage control' to fix what was an abandoned home video.
3. (The one positive I have to say.) The music. The music was cheesy, over-the-top, sounding like it came straight out of a Sega Dreamcast action game... But it works. I can safely say that the music was the single highlight of the film. (Honorable mention for Paul Logan who's awesome in just about everything.) Sorry to blast the movie like this, because kudos should be given to any filmmaker who completes a project, but man, this was one of the most poorly-made movies I have ever seen.
I don't want to spend the entire review repeating myself or coming up with as many variations of the word "terrible" I can, so I'll just go over the main points:
1. This is not a movie... It is several movies thrown in a blender and tossed on DVD with little care. I can't help but notice the two directors credited. One is Olivier Gruner, the writer, producer and star. And then there's some other guy. It really looks like the movie was abandoned at one point by the original director (Gruner?) and then the other guy came along and tried to salvage what he could of the original material, adding in scenes with Paul Logan, unending stock footage, etc. After seeing Gruner's second directorial effort ('Sector 4 Extraction'... do yourself a favor and skip it), I can't say anything positive about his directorial skills. (What's up with making all the actors speak directly into the camera??) My guess is the movie had so many issues with him in the director's chair, that someone else had to step in and re-shoot half the movie to "salvage" it.
2. Nothing happens in the movie. There is nothing at stake for any of the characters at any point. Everyone is just moping around, babbling, waiting to be picked off by The Beast, Gruner's silent killer (who, for the record, performs ZERO action in the movie!). Nothing is interesting in the 90-minute run-time! Characters are introduced, then never heard from again. Plot points are brought up, then ignored. Nothing adds up. It truly feels like half the movie was simply shot as 'damage control' to fix what was an abandoned home video.
3. (The one positive I have to say.) The music. The music was cheesy, over-the-top, sounding like it came straight out of a Sega Dreamcast action game... But it works. I can safely say that the music was the single highlight of the film. (Honorable mention for Paul Logan who's awesome in just about everything.) Sorry to blast the movie like this, because kudos should be given to any filmmaker who completes a project, but man, this was one of the most poorly-made movies I have ever seen.
- Droid_Gunner
- 19 de mar. de 2015
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Killing Machine: Re-Generator
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 1.500.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração1 hora 34 minutos
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Re-Generator (2010) officially released in India in English?
Responda