"Lumberjack the Monster" was first released at the Sitges Fantasy film festival in October last year (2023). Given the prominence of Miike as well as the dominance of Warner Brothers as the producers, one may pretty safely bet a few bucks on both parties expecting Sitges to be a great tool to market a successful premiere off. Unfortunately, Sitges was swamped with exceptional films (I kid you not, not less than 5 magnificent horror films). The long and the short is that "Lumberjack" just did not get any traction and probably not unfairly. In fact, "Lumberjack" ended up as a quiet early summer Netflix release. So the obvious question is, "is it that bad?". The good news is, no it's actually pretty good". The bad (or some might argue "better") news is, the film is a bit of an "unbalanced" balancing act. One immediately gets the impression that the length of the film was intentionally limited to the 80 minutes "action movie going crowd";sweet spot. It is unlikely that a future extended release is not foreseen, and releasing the 80 min theatre version "directly to video" (so to speak) was an opportunity missed , where a slightly longer Netflix release would potentially have resolved basic issues around character development and most of the unwanted "chaos" in story presentation. Now, it's true that Miike attained acclaim for just that, i.e. His effortless ability to create a chaotic pursuit of extreme violence in a uniquely artistic (and much loved) manner. Miike might have achieved cult status with such films (eg Ichi) but his repertoire and talents are extremely diverse and the intention with this film was clearly not to create a homage to "his" Asian Extreme genre It's simply not that type of film. Yes the book (on which the film is based) lends itself to instances of ultra violence, but it is essentially a psychological thriller / whodunnit. Miike, being Miike could also not merely push out a sleek 90s J-horror / thriller. Thus this balancing act to develop the back story and the characters. Miike sometimes makes use of clever mechanisms, such as the reading of the fairy tale, and other times het relies on interactions between main characters which occurred in the past and pops up in conversation, and unfortunately and obviously often necessarily, on flashbacks. Given the urgency / pace of the film, the actual person created through what we learn through the character backstory is conveyed through acting, tempo and atmosphere (mostly cinematography). Fortunately, all of this worked and worked well. No it does not fill all the holes in character development and storyline, but for me that is part of what makes it a Miike film. The violence is also signature Miike and OTT black comedy situations, like blood projecting out of wounds pops up without feeling out of place. The nods / homages to Gialo similarly was well placed and -executed. Even the slight body horror homage, which essentially forms the moral or philosophical basis for the film, was not overplayed or presented in a over-emotional or preachy manner. One can even call the plot and character development gaps an homage to 70s and 80s Japanese thrillers and horrors.
Thus, TL:DR: The film is very much something which Miike fans and, hopefully, everyone else will enjoy. It does not take itself too seriously and it should not. An entertaining, OTT violent whodunit with some plot holes and other slight issues but if they were not there, it would not have the film Miike was aiming for and it would definitely have lacked the needed soul.
