Avaliações de wayno-6

The problems with this documentary is a lack of structure.

It is presented in a chronological order. But it lacked cohesiveness. There was no over arching theme. A plot if you will.

It develops character, but lacked real substance. Why did he do something? It goes from vignette to vignette without any regard for the audience. I never felt like I was part of anything that was presented. It never drew me in.

Focus on one aspect of his life, rather than presenting a shot gun approach. Segmentation instead of fragmentation.

The way it was presented... Well the kindest thing I can say was: there cert was no lack of slowness.

I had been waiting with anticipation the reboot of Quantum Leap ever since I saw the first ad.

My patience was NOT rewarded. The acting was wooden and sterile. The plot was simply abysmal. This looks like their biggest budget item was for a green screen.

The special effects were very minimal and added to the overall feel of a poorly made B (or lower) Sci Fi vibe.

If there was any music in this episode I don't remember hearing anything.

This reboot will run opposite The Good Doctor. I sincerely doubt this gets any viewership to make the show viable. I predict this will be canceled mid season if not earlier.

I was able to make it to 30 minutes of the movie. I kept saying: it will get better any minute. It never did.

Benedict Cumberbatch is a fine actor. But a top actor could not rescue this steaming pile. The plot seemed more like loosely stitched vignettes, that made it difficult to follow the non cohesive plot.

No doubt that Garson and Pigeon are great actors. But everything here lacked genuine emotion. There was no suspending of disbelief.

The story was good. It showed the tireless and meticulous attention they devoted to science. But the saccharine acting was a huge disappointment.

MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS.

Was a decent one time rental from red box.

I'd give it a 1 - 1.5

If I had known it was a Scorsese film, I wouldn't have bothered. It Ended poorly -- did a lot of character development, expected a terrific ending, only to once again be disappointed.

Did NOT respect the audience, in my humble opinion.

Plot points went un-resolved at the end of the film, I was left wondering why it was in there in the first place.

Ben Kingsley did a good job, with a poor script and odd English language usage.

Wayno

I was pretty familiar with the plot of the story, having seen the original in 1981, by special effects Master, Ray Harryhausen.

The 2010 remake (in 3D) was pretty spectacular.

Unlike Avatar which relied heavily on the 3D to carry the story, Clash of the Titans (2010) used 3D to enhance the story, not carry it.

But unlike Avatar, Clash of the Titans (2010) has some 3D hiccups. Especially noticeable are scenes, where the object spreads to cover the left or right edge of the screen. (Thanks Wil!) The 3D image isn't quite so good. James Cameron, was obviously aware of this when he made Avatar. It had no 3D hiccups.

Despite that, Clash is an excellent film for the emerging 3D industry. The special effects were expected, and they were well done.

One wonders what Ray Harryhausen (retired) could do with these toys, which didn't exist 30 years ago?