Hell to Eternity
This is the first movie (from Hollywood) to deal with the incarceration of Japanese Americans in 1942 during WWII. Eighteen years is a long time for someone to get a feature together about the problem but in 1960 most of the country didn't know about (or care about) the injustice of this mass sweep of American citizens of Japanese descent. You might say this movie is required viewing just to put that piece into perspective.
The big flaw of the movie is the simplistic way it presents the situation beginning in the 1930s. An honest, decent (indeed, admirable) Japanese family in California takes in a non-Japanese kid name Guy who comes from a bad home and needs a family. The point is clear: the Japanese family is amazing, generous, and rather typical of immigrant families where the older generation doesn't know English very well and the kids are all assimilated. As stiff as it is in some ways, it's truly touching and a warming, disturbing story.
Jump ahead to Pearl Harbor and you can see where the conflict is coming. Guy is now enlistment age (as are his Japanese foster brothers, who are fighting in the European theater). What follows is a war movie based somewhat on fact-the unit he eventually joins fights the Japanese, and there is doubt, heroism, and tragedy and it's a well done story. I wonder whether audiences in 1960 quite got into it, so long after the events. (Other WWII movies were still being made, but many are about the exceptional parts of the war, like D-DAy in "The Longest Day" in 1962 or Nazi trials "Judgement in Nuremberg" in 1961.)
The main character is supposed to be based on a Mexican-American kid, but the actor (Jeffrey Hunter) is a very white American, which adds to the contrast (and meld) between cultures. (Hunter's big fame? He was the captain in the very first Star Trek episode, before Shatner.) He makes a visit to what is supposed to be Manzanar (but they show painfully little of what it would have been like). And he ends up fighting the Japanese because he knows the language.
Exactly half of the movie is about the lead-up to fighting-lots of chummy interactions, girl chasing in military clubs, and kind of 1960s lightweight entertainment. David Janssen is one of Hunter's sidekicks, and he's really good (he was famous for being the TV star in "The Fugitive"). When the fighting starts the movie clicks into place -in fact, director Phil Karlson is great with smaller budgets and yet keeping an honest intensity to the acting. The fighting is very realistic (mixing in only a small amount of archival footage). And the final impressive crisis between Guy and the remaining Japanese troops is unique and compelling. And the movie builds to this point believably.
A great movie this is not-but it has great parts, which is more than many movies can offer.
This is the first movie (from Hollywood) to deal with the incarceration of Japanese Americans in 1942 during WWII. Eighteen years is a long time for someone to get a feature together about the problem but in 1960 most of the country didn't know about (or care about) the injustice of this mass sweep of American citizens of Japanese descent. You might say this movie is required viewing just to put that piece into perspective.
The big flaw of the movie is the simplistic way it presents the situation beginning in the 1930s. An honest, decent (indeed, admirable) Japanese family in California takes in a non-Japanese kid name Guy who comes from a bad home and needs a family. The point is clear: the Japanese family is amazing, generous, and rather typical of immigrant families where the older generation doesn't know English very well and the kids are all assimilated. As stiff as it is in some ways, it's truly touching and a warming, disturbing story.
Jump ahead to Pearl Harbor and you can see where the conflict is coming. Guy is now enlistment age (as are his Japanese foster brothers, who are fighting in the European theater). What follows is a war movie based somewhat on fact-the unit he eventually joins fights the Japanese, and there is doubt, heroism, and tragedy and it's a well done story. I wonder whether audiences in 1960 quite got into it, so long after the events. (Other WWII movies were still being made, but many are about the exceptional parts of the war, like D-DAy in "The Longest Day" in 1962 or Nazi trials "Judgement in Nuremberg" in 1961.)
The main character is supposed to be based on a Mexican-American kid, but the actor (Jeffrey Hunter) is a very white American, which adds to the contrast (and meld) between cultures. (Hunter's big fame? He was the captain in the very first Star Trek episode, before Shatner.) He makes a visit to what is supposed to be Manzanar (but they show painfully little of what it would have been like). And he ends up fighting the Japanese because he knows the language.
Exactly half of the movie is about the lead-up to fighting-lots of chummy interactions, girl chasing in military clubs, and kind of 1960s lightweight entertainment. David Janssen is one of Hunter's sidekicks, and he's really good (he was famous for being the TV star in "The Fugitive"). When the fighting starts the movie clicks into place -in fact, director Phil Karlson is great with smaller budgets and yet keeping an honest intensity to the acting. The fighting is very realistic (mixing in only a small amount of archival footage). And the final impressive crisis between Guy and the remaining Japanese troops is unique and compelling. And the movie builds to this point believably.
A great movie this is not-but it has great parts, which is more than many movies can offer.