The French movie Sous le sable was shown in the U.S. with the translated title Under the Sand (2000). It was written and directed by François Ozon.
It stars Charlotte Rampling as Marie Drillon, a loving wife whose husband disappears from the beach, and from her life, suddenly and with no explanation. The remainder of the movie shows us how Marie deals with this bizarre, horrible situation. (Not well, by any definition.)
It's worth noting that Rampling is clearly fluently bilingual. In real life, she was born in England, but educated in France. I have no way of knowing whether or not she speaks French with a strong English accent. In this role, it doesn't matter, because she's English, living in France.
Charlotte Rampling was very beautiful, and it's obvious that director Ozon is absolutely entranced by her beauty. (At one point-in case we missed it-a saleswoman tells Marie that "the dress shows off your figure.") For the entire movie, the camera is directed at Rampling, often with long closeups of her face. (Rampling was 54 at the time, but looked 45.)
This is a film about Charlotte Rampling's beauty. Without Rampling there wouldn't be a movie.
I had mixed feelings about this film. The basic concept of a a woman forced to deal with the disappearance of the husband she loves is interesting. The way Marie copes-or doesn't cope-with the situation is also interesting.
However, I prefer a movie with more actors than just one. The film as Ozon gives it to us depends on us wanting to see Rampling-and essentially only Rampling-in every scene. If she weren't beautiful, would the movie work at all?
We saw this film on DVD, which was fine. After the opening at the beach, most of the action takes place indoors. Under the Sand has an IMDb rating of 7.1. I agree with this, and rated it 7.
It stars Charlotte Rampling as Marie Drillon, a loving wife whose husband disappears from the beach, and from her life, suddenly and with no explanation. The remainder of the movie shows us how Marie deals with this bizarre, horrible situation. (Not well, by any definition.)
It's worth noting that Rampling is clearly fluently bilingual. In real life, she was born in England, but educated in France. I have no way of knowing whether or not she speaks French with a strong English accent. In this role, it doesn't matter, because she's English, living in France.
Charlotte Rampling was very beautiful, and it's obvious that director Ozon is absolutely entranced by her beauty. (At one point-in case we missed it-a saleswoman tells Marie that "the dress shows off your figure.") For the entire movie, the camera is directed at Rampling, often with long closeups of her face. (Rampling was 54 at the time, but looked 45.)
This is a film about Charlotte Rampling's beauty. Without Rampling there wouldn't be a movie.
I had mixed feelings about this film. The basic concept of a a woman forced to deal with the disappearance of the husband she loves is interesting. The way Marie copes-or doesn't cope-with the situation is also interesting.
However, I prefer a movie with more actors than just one. The film as Ozon gives it to us depends on us wanting to see Rampling-and essentially only Rampling-in every scene. If she weren't beautiful, would the movie work at all?
We saw this film on DVD, which was fine. After the opening at the beach, most of the action takes place indoors. Under the Sand has an IMDb rating of 7.1. I agree with this, and rated it 7.