You may never have thought about it, but there are people who tell us (and not without merit and some valid points), that even someone like Hitler could not have been a monster 24/7 ... now what does that mean? If someone says that, you should assume that they are trying to figure out what the appeal was. Because the way we learn about him ... it sounds like everyone back then must have been equally evil or completely crazy.
I would assume that some were just roped into things ... Htiler and everyone around him got others to see a human side in them. Now why do I go to all those lengths? Because the same thing can be applied here. We see a bit of a human side of Bundy. He is not just the wild crazy maniac - I mean he is of course, but the performance here and the script give him some depth. And give Bill, the one interviewing him, something to hold onto.
Intriguing and suspensful - living of the performances of the main cast and some terrific developments. And a really exhilarating highlight towards the end ... talk about face off ... and talk about sucking someone and really getting them into their head ... not an easy watch for sure and not for everyone either.
I would assume that some were just roped into things ... Htiler and everyone around him got others to see a human side in them. Now why do I go to all those lengths? Because the same thing can be applied here. We see a bit of a human side of Bundy. He is not just the wild crazy maniac - I mean he is of course, but the performance here and the script give him some depth. And give Bill, the one interviewing him, something to hold onto.
Intriguing and suspensful - living of the performances of the main cast and some terrific developments. And a really exhilarating highlight towards the end ... talk about face off ... and talk about sucking someone and really getting them into their head ... not an easy watch for sure and not for everyone either.