Contemporary mainland films have been left behind by films from other regions, you know?
Why do mainland movies always use strict censorship as an excuse for poor production?
This time "the pig the snake the pigeon" can be regarded as a resounding slap in the face to mainland film directors. "The pig the snake the pigeon" has a good balance between the art of the film and human values. The previous story tells about the evil deeds of social evils, which can be regarded as showing the evil in society. But the ending does not end with just a few lines: "Chen Guilin committed several felonies of murder and was sentenced to death." Instead, it clearly presents the entire process of criminals before they are executed, letting the audience know the principle of "do no evil and do all good".
In the end, the villain "Chen Guilin" who seemed to have the halo of the protagonist did not escape justice, but the law respects every natural person. Chen Guilin enjoyed a good meal, smoked a cigarette, and drank a glass of wine for the last time. These are the solemn and solemn laws that the law gives to everyone. The last dignity of a life.
This balance allowed the film to pass the censorship despite such strict film censorship in mainland China. Mainland film directors, please stop using censorship as an excuse. If it's bad, it's bad. Please accept it with an open mind and use this film as a new benchmark. Think about how to balance evil and good.
Except for Article 20 in the Spring Festival episode, I didn't read any others, but "Article 20" confirms that sentence: it looks like homework handed in by primary school students.
It is understood that Spring Festival movies have a lot of trolls and their ratings are falsely high.
Why do mainland movies always use strict censorship as an excuse for poor production?
This time "the pig the snake the pigeon" can be regarded as a resounding slap in the face to mainland film directors. "The pig the snake the pigeon" has a good balance between the art of the film and human values. The previous story tells about the evil deeds of social evils, which can be regarded as showing the evil in society. But the ending does not end with just a few lines: "Chen Guilin committed several felonies of murder and was sentenced to death." Instead, it clearly presents the entire process of criminals before they are executed, letting the audience know the principle of "do no evil and do all good".
In the end, the villain "Chen Guilin" who seemed to have the halo of the protagonist did not escape justice, but the law respects every natural person. Chen Guilin enjoyed a good meal, smoked a cigarette, and drank a glass of wine for the last time. These are the solemn and solemn laws that the law gives to everyone. The last dignity of a life.
This balance allowed the film to pass the censorship despite such strict film censorship in mainland China. Mainland film directors, please stop using censorship as an excuse. If it's bad, it's bad. Please accept it with an open mind and use this film as a new benchmark. Think about how to balance evil and good.
Except for Article 20 in the Spring Festival episode, I didn't read any others, but "Article 20" confirms that sentence: it looks like homework handed in by primary school students.
It is understood that Spring Festival movies have a lot of trolls and their ratings are falsely high.