70 reviews
Actor, producer, writer and director Jerry G. Angelo wore all these hats, as one would in a high school drama class to create a project that's been done many times before, and thus also over-cliched. The directing is the only fairly decent quality of this film, and even that felt amateurish. The acting is sub-par, even for c-list actors, probably from the lack of directing the cast effectively. None of the cast were convincing, and they all seemed to struggle in the acting department. The screenplay was all over the place and the slow dragged-out pacing made the 105 mins feel like 3 hours. The sound was way off and distant, no boom mics? The score was too evident and annoying. A huge pass on this one, and ignore all the fake reviews. It's a very generous 3/10 from me
- Top_Dawg_Critic
- Apr 11, 2019
- Permalink
- lasithamarasinghe
- Apr 13, 2019
- Permalink
I believe the main character's wife and daughter were about the best actors in this movie. I feel bad giving this movie only three stars, but I can't in good conscience give it more. I think the writer = director = actor dude really meant well. I think he really tried to draw attention to PTSD; and there are a couple of scenes that work and show some potential -- but only a few. I think most everybody in this movie tried too hard - there is very little that comes off natural. If you are contemplating whether or not to watch this, you should probably watch something else. If you have any kind of military background then I definitely would consider something else. I'm really not sure who could love this movie... only the truly naive with bleeding hearts - maybe...
- wenzel-jason
- Sep 24, 2019
- Permalink
Nonsensical rubbish, rotten acting and actors that simply don't fit in many of the scenes. It simply is unconvincing. Sad to say, this movie's current 8.7 rating appears to be yet another colossal up-vote by cast, crew and all their extended families.
- Netjer-y-khet
- Apr 11, 2019
- Permalink
"current 8.5 rating appears to be yet another colossal up-vote by cast, crew and all their extended families." I Agree.
- sixtythunder
- May 9, 2018
- Permalink
This movie was terrible I have never seen anything so slow with such terrible acting. Not sure how it even has a rating over 5!! Dont waste your time
- demidenden
- Apr 12, 2019
- Permalink
Not good ,would not recommend ,like another review said jingoistic ,testosterone fuelled meh fest .
- goblyn-78669
- Apr 12, 2019
- Permalink
- matt-00134
- May 6, 2019
- Permalink
Why I liked this movie is because of how Jerry G. Angelo perfectly captured the complexity of the hero suffering (PTSD) because of his success as a hero. When some of you have lived longer and are aware of how "we can become victims of our own success" then you may come to enjoy such movies from this level of appreciation, if no other. In the movie Troy when Achilles was told "...But if you go to Troy, you will never come back... for your glory walks hand-in-hand with your doom." ...and since becoming aware of it, I have seen this dynamic play out, such as when a fellow employee who is busy and productive, gets even more work thrown at him until it becomes unsustainable for him and gets fired or he moves on. American Warfighter carries this truth further down the road of cinematic lore. For this reason, I say it's a great movie and highly watchable! Well done Jerry :)
- stephena-levesque
- Sep 22, 2019
- Permalink
I enjoyed this film. I like how Angelo showed that PTSD isn't just a result from war and violence, but can still occur in anyone. He took a realistic approach in showing how people don't always know that they do have PTSD or know what's causing them distress. From a psychological point of view, I think it was executed pretty well.
I do agree that there were definitely some bad lines in a few scenes that I don't think were needed anyway. Also the last two minutes of the film did bring it down a bit. But everything else I thought was great!
- horsescollegelife
- Feb 9, 2020
- Permalink
Part drama, part action, part humanity. Blended into something that held my interest, and investment in the characters. I was confused by the ending, make of it what you will. No cgi, bungie cords or dark studio scenes-i consider that a plus these days.
- alfredlodoardi
- Oct 11, 2019
- Permalink
This is the worst excuse for a Navy Seal movie EVER!!!! Don't waste your time. They obviously spent little to no time researching actual seals and spent no time at all with actual seals. They don't even hold their weapons correctly. This is awful.
The SEAL Load Outs looked awful. AR-15 had no ACOG, Halogen Weapon Sights, PEQ-13 or Suppressors. They wore awful bright white badges which you could see from space. The main actor plays a Officer: Lieutenant, in the movie and the whole time in the movie, he acted more like he's an idiot and never leads his team. Their load out for cammies were awful because SEALs don't wear generic cammies. Their load out for boots sucked too,,, it looks like the movie was on a very limited budget that their AR-15s came plain with just iron sights.When it came to details like weapons, they were far off, and SEALs are known for carrying the best stuff like customized weapons and gear. None of them were using military terms during the movie. I don't think any of the characters were in the military and how the Teams work either. There was no professionalism in the movie. None of them acted like a SpecOp person but like lame idiots who gave the US Navy and the Naval Special Warfare a bad name.
- junobug-23139
- May 15, 2019
- Permalink
IMDb is getting flooded with fake reviews. Nowadays you can't just read a positive review without checking the profile whether or not it may be legit, and everything beyond 7 stars is usually fake, no matter which film. If this continuous nobody should bother visiting anymore.
Here is a good example that all those saying it's a great film are in some way or another associated with the film crew or simply took a bit money. Click on their rotten profiles and see for yourself.
To the the film itself: Practically zero redeeming qualities. I just added an extra star for the locations. Bad acting, amateurish directing and editing, lame combat scenes without much of an understanding on what to do, they even momentarily cease fire to have a chat while enemy combatants are closing in. Seriously? The PTSD addition could have been interesting, instead you end up thinking "WTF!?!".
So the message might have been honorable, the execution certainly was not. Watch "13 Hours" instead if you want to see pros depicting pros.
Here is a good example that all those saying it's a great film are in some way or another associated with the film crew or simply took a bit money. Click on their rotten profiles and see for yourself.
To the the film itself: Practically zero redeeming qualities. I just added an extra star for the locations. Bad acting, amateurish directing and editing, lame combat scenes without much of an understanding on what to do, they even momentarily cease fire to have a chat while enemy combatants are closing in. Seriously? The PTSD addition could have been interesting, instead you end up thinking "WTF!?!".
So the message might have been honorable, the execution certainly was not. Watch "13 Hours" instead if you want to see pros depicting pros.
- LoremIpsum321
- Apr 17, 2019
- Permalink
I know there are B grade movies, but this deserves a Z. Terrible acting, terrible production, just all round bad.
Let's put things in perspective.
Green book is an 8/10.
Midnight Express is a 10.
As IMBECILES (with respect), if you rated this over 5 you require blacklisting!
- dnob-58707
- Apr 12, 2019
- Permalink
- nogodnomasters
- Apr 27, 2019
- Permalink
Nothing good about this.. Acting, story and everything else is hopeless. Did not manage to watch the full lenght of the movie
- zathan-32848
- Apr 13, 2019
- Permalink
Film is okish, they could have improved it if they halved the length of most of the scenes. Some of the acting isn't good. I think they are a number of fake 10 reviews. I would rate about 4 to 5, but will give this a 1 as to balance the score better.
I think that most of the reviews for this movie were written by video game warriors looking for the next installment of The Expendables or GI Joe. This is more for those that have actually been there and done that. If you're looking for a high budget full auto shooter Rambo flick, keep moving. If you're looking for a drama that accurately portrays true life and the issues faced by returning servicemen, give it a try.
- ajwinslow-1
- Jun 23, 2019
- Permalink
Ok so it's not a high-budget box office hit with A-list actors... I'm ok with that. I enjoy finding movies I've never heard of and giving them a chance. I wish a few things had been clarified a little more, but overall I enjoyed the movie. I thought the main character was really likable as well. So many movie snobs out there... smh.
Without question some of the worst acting i have ever seen - i want that time back. 100% cheese. And not in a good way . Its more exciting watching water boil , and more entertaing reading a bag of chips . Awful
- wavesniper
- Apr 19, 2019
- Permalink
I managed to make it through 10 minutes until I picked up my phone. Extremely poor acting especially the military scenes, poor dialogue, terrible camera work and atrocious lighting and sound which it basically all that a movie contains. Don't waste your time.
- djshadowfax
- Apr 28, 2019
- Permalink