IMDb RATING
4.5/10
3.7K
YOUR RATING
A recovering drug addict takes a job with a documentary crew who plans to interview three subjects who claim to be real life monsters.A recovering drug addict takes a job with a documentary crew who plans to interview three subjects who claim to be real life monsters.A recovering drug addict takes a job with a documentary crew who plans to interview three subjects who claim to be real life monsters.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThis movie started as a Kickstarter project. It had a total of 124 backers according to the movie's own credits.
- GoofsOxycontin makes your pupils constrict, not dilate. It is said twice about the opiate addict.
- ConnectionsReferences Dracula (1931)
Featured review
The premise: A couple of YouTubers making fake monster videos put out an ad to film and interview any REAL monsters in the area, without expecting to get exactly that. (The trailer gives all this away, so I'm not spoiling anything.)
The premise is great, but there really isn't much of a story. I guess that's the way a lot of found footage movies are if they're done well - they feel spontaneous. This didn't. It felt scripted.
The effects are great, and the performances of the people being interviewed are good, in my opinion. But the interviewing team's performances are terrible. A lot of overacting. And who ever heard of a cameraperson that won't shut up? Things get better as the movie progresses, but the beginning is very annoying. I think his character was supposed to be some sort of comic relief?
The story was periodically derailed by unnecessary drama among the crew - which they filmed and included in their "monster documentary" for some unknown reason.
The atmospheric sound effects and music were good, but WAY too heavy-handed and in some cases, just unnecessary.
Loved the special effects and makeup! They were so good that I didn't understand why they pulled the camera away from the action or lit things so you could barely see them. There were enough close ups to see that they didn't need to.
The ending caught me by surprise only because it seemed so inconsistent with the rest of the movie. It didn't make sense and felt like a last minute idea. If the rest of the movie would have supported the ending better, I think I may have liked the whole thing a lot more.
If you watch the first 10 minutes or so, then skip to about a quarter of the way in, you might have a better experience. If I ever watch this again, that's what I plan to do.
It's worth a watch, but this is too flawed to be called "good." It's just "okay." I'm being generous in giving it 6/10.
The premise is great, but there really isn't much of a story. I guess that's the way a lot of found footage movies are if they're done well - they feel spontaneous. This didn't. It felt scripted.
The effects are great, and the performances of the people being interviewed are good, in my opinion. But the interviewing team's performances are terrible. A lot of overacting. And who ever heard of a cameraperson that won't shut up? Things get better as the movie progresses, but the beginning is very annoying. I think his character was supposed to be some sort of comic relief?
The story was periodically derailed by unnecessary drama among the crew - which they filmed and included in their "monster documentary" for some unknown reason.
The atmospheric sound effects and music were good, but WAY too heavy-handed and in some cases, just unnecessary.
Loved the special effects and makeup! They were so good that I didn't understand why they pulled the camera away from the action or lit things so you could barely see them. There were enough close ups to see that they didn't need to.
The ending caught me by surprise only because it seemed so inconsistent with the rest of the movie. It didn't make sense and felt like a last minute idea. If the rest of the movie would have supported the ending better, I think I may have liked the whole thing a lot more.
If you watch the first 10 minutes or so, then skip to about a quarter of the way in, you might have a better experience. If I ever watch this again, that's what I plan to do.
It's worth a watch, but this is too flawed to be called "good." It's just "okay." I'm being generous in giving it 6/10.
- WisdomsHammer
- Apr 21, 2018
- Permalink
- How long is The Monster Project?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Donde habita el diablo
- Filming locations
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $250,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 39 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content