IMDb RATING
5.9/10
208
YOUR RATING
Examining various battles during America's Civil War, Civil War Chronicles exposes America's unsung heroes.Examining various battles during America's Civil War, Civil War Chronicles exposes America's unsung heroes.Examining various battles during America's Civil War, Civil War Chronicles exposes America's unsung heroes.
- Awards
- 2 nominations
Browse episodes
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaCream Productions was so bombarded with negative reviews for their inaccurate portrayal of the American Civil War they were forced to remove their Facebook review page and block and delete numerous reviewers.
Featured review
Key battles of the American Civil War, as seen through the eyes of soldiers from either side.
A novel idea, very badly executed. Most war documentaries give the strategic view - this give's the everyman's view. Just not an interesting, accurate or compelling one.
The characters are generally well chosen but the dramatisations are quite weak and don't really give that much of an insight into the battle. Due to the narrow focus, much of the detail is lost. For example, if you watched the episode on the Battle of Antietam you would think that the entire battle occurred in the cornfield. Burnside's Bridge is not mentioned, or Bloody Lane. Similarly, Gettysburg covers only Big and Little Round Tops. Pickett's Charge isn't even mentioned by name.
To make it worse, you have the worst line-up of historians-for-hire ever. More salesmen than historians, their job seems to be to talk up, through shouting and talking fast, the importance of each battle and these characters parts in it. The Battle of Nashville, which was much more a coup de grace than a pivotal battle, gets turned into something vital to the survival of Sherman's Army and the Union. The hyperbole on display is quite ridiculous.
Not even a series for Civil War beginners, this is that dumbed down and inaccurate.
Do yourself a favour: watch Ken Burns's The Civil War instead. Surely the greatest documentary series ever made, on any subject.
A novel idea, very badly executed. Most war documentaries give the strategic view - this give's the everyman's view. Just not an interesting, accurate or compelling one.
The characters are generally well chosen but the dramatisations are quite weak and don't really give that much of an insight into the battle. Due to the narrow focus, much of the detail is lost. For example, if you watched the episode on the Battle of Antietam you would think that the entire battle occurred in the cornfield. Burnside's Bridge is not mentioned, or Bloody Lane. Similarly, Gettysburg covers only Big and Little Round Tops. Pickett's Charge isn't even mentioned by name.
To make it worse, you have the worst line-up of historians-for-hire ever. More salesmen than historians, their job seems to be to talk up, through shouting and talking fast, the importance of each battle and these characters parts in it. The Battle of Nashville, which was much more a coup de grace than a pivotal battle, gets turned into something vital to the survival of Sherman's Army and the Union. The hyperbole on display is quite ridiculous.
Not even a series for Civil War beginners, this is that dumbed down and inaccurate.
Do yourself a favour: watch Ken Burns's The Civil War instead. Surely the greatest documentary series ever made, on any subject.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Blood and Fury: America's Civil War
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was The Civil War: Brothers Divided (2016) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer