Warwick

I'm so angry I wasted time watching this movie. In fact it's not a movie at all. It's a 30 minute short film with 40 minutes of the most boring B-roll you will ever have to endure! If it was edited down to a 30 minute short film, it would have been interesting. Don't waste your time with this, unless watching paint dry is your cup of tea. I want my 70 minutes back!!!

This movie was really horrible. I know slow and haunting is something directors go for nowadays, but this was just bad. Yes, I get that it's low budget, but that's no reason for trying to make a Feature Length film out of a short film. The majority of the first half hour is filled with long, unnecessary shots that do nothing to add to the story (there IS no story for the first half hour), but just eat up time. The entire movie is about eating up time. There is only about 20 minutes of meat on the bone. The story is scant. The director wants a feature length film on a budget and only accomplishes this by making it drag on. Case study - the first shot. Everyone in the room went 'what?' at the length. I promise you, you will not enjoy this movie.

Dear director, next time you want to make a movie with your fiancé - learn from Guy Ritchie - don't.

There's something about this film that kept my attention. It is full of motion and loneliness. The plot is paper thin but the constant motion kept me thinking something is about to happen in any minute.

A young boy alone from a town in another state goes to Seattle - finding his way round in the city and his mind opens himself to himself and life.

Very little dialog. Low budget. But I found it worth watching.