Superman

Honestly, this version of Superman feels way too childish and overly comical. The tone is all over the place - cringey one-liners, awkward slapstick, and visuals that look like they belong in a Saturday morning cartoon. Instead of being a bold reimagining, it feels like a step back into campy territory no one really asked for.

David Corenswet, while a decent lookalike, completely fails to capture the commanding presence and charisma that Henry Cavill brought to the role. Cavill had gravitas - a balance of strength, vulnerability, and quiet intensity. Corenswet feels... light. Like he's playing dress-up rather than embodying Earth's greatest protector.

Worse, the theater itself reflected the film's flat tone. The room was dead quiet - barely a chuckle, almost no reaction. It was a sharp contrast to the electric energy I felt during Deadpool vs Wolverine, where the whole crowd was engaged, laughing, reacting. This Superman? It just didn't land.

Compared to Man of Steel, which had emotional depth, stunning visuals, and a powerful score, this version feels hollow. It might please kids or hardcore nostalgia fans, but it's missing soul.

Rating: 6/10 - Looks like Superman, but lacks the heart, presence, and impact. For something truly heroic, revisit Man of Steel.

"Superman! Champion of the oppressed. The physical marvel who had sworn to devote his existence to helping those in need."

• Jerry Siegel

James Gunn's Superman (2025) arrives at a turbulent time for DC, aiming to rebuild a fractured universe with a fresh yet familiar take on the Man of Steel. David Corenswet's Superman stands between corrupt business and political powers, becoming a controversial figure as he fights for justice and exposes a deeply rigged system.

The film balances a darker, politically charged story with playful, charismatic performances. Corenswet's bond with Krypto (Murphy Weed) adds emotional warmth, while Rachel Brosnahan's Lois Lane and Nicholas Hoult's Lex Luthor embody the hopeful and sinister sides of this new DC world. Supporting heroes like Mr. Terrific, Guy Gardner, Hawkgirl, Metamorpho, and Jimmy Olsen hint at a larger universe in the making.

The real standout is the craft: Henry Braham's immersive cinematography, a powerful score, and sharp editing with near-invisible VFX create a grand, IMAX-worthy spectacle. It may not offer the seamless mythic weight of earlier Superman films, but it's a thrilling, emotionally charged experience that reminds us why we ever believed in heroes.

I wanted to love this movie. However it is very weak and doesn't hit the right notes. The music score in this is below average, it doesn't make you feel or create any swell of emotion. The best part of the movie was the relationship between Clark & Lois and yet there's so many other sub plots that aren't needed. Superman feels like Superboy or just Clark Kent in a suit. He is portrayed as a wuss. Lex Luthers character made little sense, He acts like a big petulant baby the whole time yelling out combos and will rip apart the fabric of the world for what? Ultraman is just a weak version of Zod.

Someone at Warner Bros must have looked at Superman and thought: "What if we made him weaker, less inspiring, and more annoying-then sprinkled in a script so thin it couldn't survive a sneeze?" Congratulations, they did it. This so-called Supermen movie is a catastrophe wearing a cape.

The writing is abysmal. Every line feels like it was churned out by an AI trained on bad fan fiction and energy drink commercials. The pacing? Imagine a snail on tranquilizers. Plot twists? Only if you count "Superman gets tired" as groundbreaking.

And then there's the Man of Steel himself. Since when does Superman bruise like a college freshman in a bar fight? The movie actually zooms in on a bruise, as if the audience is supposed to gasp at how "realistic" it is. No-what it really is, is pathetic. The whole point of Superman is that he's above this kind of nonsense. Stripping him down to some half-baked, fragile mortal doesn't make him relatable. It makes him unrecognizable.

The villains are cardboard cutouts, the CGI looks like leftovers from a PS3 cutscene, and the emotional beats land with the force of a wet napkin. By the end, you're not rooting for Superman. You're rooting for the credits to roll so you can escape.

This isn't just the worst Superman movie. It's the cinematic equivalent of kryptonite. If there's any justice in the universe, this film gets buried in the Phantom Zone where no one has to suffer through it again.

A movie I had been waiting for a long time!!! As a Superman fan since Smallville, James Gunn's choice to portray Superman as the good, heroic man he truly is, simply perfect.

Bringing Superman back as a symbol of hope and faith in humanity-while tying his story to sharp critiques of today's geopolitical climate-made Superman the best superhero film of 2025 and one of DC's best, second only to Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy.